SACRED MATRIX

A Manifesto for the Children of the 21st Century

OVERVIEW

We, Sapiens, have been rising, are rising, evolving in a unique, post
Darwinian modality, rapidly, precociously, from square one as a slave
species a brief 200,000 years ago to going to the stars, shortly, as our own “gods”, our own half-alien evolutionary artists. We will talk here about stepping out of racial adolescence, restoring our real history and what the ramifications are for the present and the future beyond the slave-code
religions, the sublimation of our ancient master-slave relationship to the
Anunnaki. The totems and taboos of our racial adolescence dispelled,
Prometheus can get off his rock and reach genetic satori; Job can get off
his dung heap and complete his EST training; Buddha can open his eyes and
reach genetic enlightenment; Jesus the man can disavow sectarian politics
and run again for genetic office.

If I am right, if, you will find here a literal rethinking of this planet; a
comprehensive, robust and startling new worldview of who and what we are;
the ramifications of the restoration of our true history as a genetically
engineered species; a resolution of the creationist-evolutionist conflict; a
clear view of the forward trajectory of our species’ real evolution. In
short, the focus of this site is on a new view of planetary reality at a
fundamental level far more profound than the usual political, religious,
historical, intellectual concepts in which we think —– and conflict.

You will find here a vision of the generic human beyond religion, Darwin’s
quaint view of evolution, the recycled explanations and failed solutions of
millennia past, and the old new age. You will find hope, positive direction,
progress, talk of immortality, the new human, and a view from 2100 A.D. of
where our species’ realevolution could, should, will take us within the next
100 years. You will find yourself, here, Sapiens, rising, perhaps a bit
dazed, now coming out of species adolescence, eager and ready for alien
society. The largest focus is Universe. The immediate focus is on the
children: we must not lose one more generation of our best to our primitive
follies.

The more I know, the more I know I don’t know. At any given time you access
this site, it will be the best I can conceive, the best I can offer, with
respect, and for your judgment. it is a work in progress and, intentionally,
will improve continually: please visit from time to time. The information
offered here is worthless unless utilized.

3.
This is written on the first day of Spring, 2004. The life force coming back
up from its winter pause in the Earth here in the high desert is tangible,
timeless, unconcerned and amused. The golden heat from our reliable local
solar furnace feels even better on my shoulders than when I was a kid
roaming the summer stream banks back East. When I look around, however, from
a futant perspective, the entire population of the planet looks as if it’s
in a mild agony, most intense in the bodies and minds of the young being
sacrificed by the elders in yet another criminal war, but effecting all to
some degree from pole to pole. For we are at yet another of those crises,
turning points in our short and puzzling species’ history, each one more
critically decisive because of the gravity of the immediate threats to our
survival with which we insist on confronting ourselves.

This site is the work of a “think tank” of one — a generalist, futurist and
futant, by genetic proclivity, in one skin. Concomitantly, however, I
acknowledge everyone, including the alien “community”, witting or unwitting,
as collaborators because, as a generic human, I want to know how everything
and everyone relate to every other thing and person. In a word, the focus is
Universe. That may seem a bit grandiose but, in this age of decadent and,
often, funding dependent specialization, someone had better damn well do it.

As a generalist, currently, I am focused on the resolution of the ancient
conflicts, contradictions, questions and paradoxes of our species’ puzzling
and clearly manipulated history —- in the context of Universe. The goal:
to bring our knowledge to the stage of change marked by the fifth line of
Hexagram 57, The Gentle, Penetration, of the venerable I Ching:
Remorse vanishes.
Nothing that does not further.
No beginning, but and end.
Good fortune.

Which change morphs the situation into Hexagram 18, Work on what has been
spoiled: the futurist, on the lookout for the “wild cards” that may ambush
or afford accelerated advantage, integrates the potential and cautionary
signals of cutting edge developments in all disciplines and arenas with the
retrieved past to transform what has been spoiled into an overarching,
comprehensive, generically human, forward-creative paradigm.

What has been spoiled, wasted, all these millennia, are generation after
generation of our young, the lives of countless millions, through the
Babel-factored conflicts and hideous wars, more often than not due to
nothing more or less than the insane “my god is better than your god”
syndrome. True, as a genetically engineered slave species, we should go a
little easy on ourselves due to the, perhaps, uniqueness of our “unnatural”
situation, but that does not mitigate the immediacy of the danger of the
mess we have gotten ourselves into planet wide. And what is the mess all
about?

The perspective of the futant view from 2100 A.D. finds our denial of our
beginnings and history, our Babel-factored ignorance of what and who we are,
our continuance in cargo cult, godspell, slave-code “religions”, our
disconnect with nature, our resignation to death, our ridiculous reaction to
the obvious alien presence, our lack of comprehension of our real
evolutionary trajectory, embarrassingly primitive. This syndrome is the most
fundamental formative factor at base of the clash of civilizations, nations,
tribes, individuals.

It’s best to begin to give a futant report from an anchor point in the
present, logically, in this case, from within the center of the current
crisis. It is difficult, however, because there is no encapsulating the
essence of this crisis as political, or economic, or sociological, or
scientific, or military or philosophical or religious: it is inescapably
about everything. Its inexorable, ponderous churning, disturbing the bodies
and minds of everyone on planet and off, is about entire world views, solar
system views and views of the cosmos, human and alien. Personal realities,
the strong or tenuous views of self identity, of individuals, groups, of
cultures, religions, nations, and what it fundamentally is to be generically
human on this planet are constantly being probed and challenged, the
constant irritation leading to profound unease, disease and overt conflict.

What is the fundamental, core problem? The entire planet, all its cultures,
religions, politics and sociology including the definition of “human”
requires, indeed demands, radical rethinking including the institutions and
authorities to which we have always looked for truth and validation.

What has brought the planet to this point? By 2000 we in the West had
accumulated more than sufficient evidence and data to restore the true
history of our amazing beginnings and precocious development to ourselves
—– and found ourselves to have been far deeper in denial, indeed close to
species amnesia, with regard to those vital facts than we in the East. The
gradually accumulated, overwhelming archaeological and historical
information and data from the past, elucidated by the science of the
present, gives clear, overwhelming evidence of an entirely new,
comprehensive and overarching worldview that corrects, subsumes and replaces
the old. This new paradigm is attributed to the Nobel quality work of the
Sumerian scholar, Zecharia Sitchin.

The Key to Planetary Unity

The key fact that is the cause of the revolution in interpretation and
understanding is that the transcultural gods (the Anunnaki [Sumerian: those
who came down from the heavens; Hebrew: Anakeim, Nefilim; Egyptian: Neter,
the "Watchers") known to all the ancient civilizations, as Sitchin has
conclusively demonstrated, were not mythological, but real flesh and blood
humanoids. They were, most probably still are, an alien civilization who
colonized this planet 432,000 years ago coming from their home planet, the
tenth, Planet X, Nibiru, in our own solar system. They came here for gold,
eventually created us by genetically crossing their genes with those of Homo
Erectus around 200,000 years ago as a slave race for their mining
operations. That profound reinterpretation of our beginnings and subsequent
development changes everything. Literally.
Corroboration comes from evidence for the existence in our solar system of
Planet X/Nibiru from the Naval Observatory, probably found by the IRAS
search in '83-'94; the mitochondrial DNA "search for Eve"; the "out of
Africa" data placing our genesis in Central Africa 250,000 years.

The ramifications and consequences, which I explored and laid out in 1987 in
Breaking the Godspell are astounding, startling and powerful. The word from
station DNA is these "gods" wear designer genes.

We are a genetically engineered, mutant species with bicameral genetics,
bicameral mind, moving through a rapid, non-Darwian development, now coming
out of species adolescence into an independent maturity and identity. We
have progressed from being their slave animals to limited partnership and
are now phasing out of a 3000 year traumatic transition to racial
independence, a rapid metamorphic process, under the imperative of our
advanced Nefilim genetic component.

Religion, as we know it world wide, is the residual sublimation and
transmutation of the ancient master-slave relationship, the godspell,
expressed in the slave-code commandments still echoing down the ages in our
cargo-cult rituals of subservient worship (work-ship). It is manifest that
Jehovah/YHWH, Adonai, the Lord, and Allah, El, were all Anunnaki. The
concept of "God" as a stern male disciplinarian doling out horrendous
physical punishments, as well as the cosmified metaphysical edition is no
longer adequate and almost embarrassing. Those who still swear by the Bible,
in any of its myriad versions, as the revealed word of their "God" have to
ignore or deny the clear fact that the Old Testament was a skewed and forged
theo-political rewrite of a far more ancient document, the Enuma Elish,
dating from at least Sumeria, which was not theological at all.

Transcendental experience is redefined as dimensional expansion and
participation at the leading edge of our species and individual metamorphic
self exploration. The "occult" is time-release packages of advanced
technological information entrusted to us in "crash courses" in
civilization. Ooparts, high-tech tools, toys, artifacts, "out of place" in
time are remnants of lost technology and knowledge and clues to recovering
our true history. The new synthesis subsumes partial glimpses of a new
politic, new world order, enlightened eco-economics, re-hashed Eastern or
Western mysticism, a third culture, spiritualized psychology, or cerebral
turning points.

This is the only worldview which is comprehensive and robust enough to
explain and correct all our previous explanations of the basic question: Who
are we and where did we really come from? It is the only paradigm coherent
and comprehensive enough to provide a planetarily consensual context by
which to unify all humans and achieve world order and peace and free us, as
a species, to matriculate into stellar society. We now have the keys to
integrate our past in the concept of generic humanity, the critical factor
for planetary unity. We have had at hand for an embarrassingly long time,
more than enough evidence, information and capabilities to literally rethink
this Planet. We are long overdue, to the point of species endangerment, to
get on with it.
What to do after genetic enlightenment has broken the godspell, the
looking-to-the-sky-for-daddy to return, master-slave attitude the deepest
dye in the fabrics of all cultures? Physical immortality, possessed by the
Nefilim, withheld from humans, will be transformed from "religious"
afterlife reward to the dominant characteristic of the dawning phase of our
racial maturation. We will be our own "gods", our own genetic credentials,
play our own god-games with an unassailable racial identity enabling us to
step confidently into stellar society. I explored these dimensions as a
practicing immortal in God Games: What Do You Do Forever?

It is the children who are the prime concern here. The view from 2100 says
clearly that Sapiens is indeed rising. These futant experiential
intelligence briefings, the product of best effort, are offered respectfully
and cautiously to the end that Sapiens, having retrieved the common
genealogy and history, caught the direction of the trajectory of freedom,
will grasp a sense of species identity and planetary unity. We work toward
the time when, having achieved friendly separation from the ancient parents,
come out of dazed species adolescence, Sapiens will finally break into
laughter at the absurdity of godspell separation and, looking around, see
that the children are, for the first time, with great relief, also sharing
the laughter. We all need to work on what has been spoiled for their sake
and ours. I invite you to join in the process. In order to intelligently
work on what has been spoiled in the past, it is best to understand those
effects in the present.

This crisis has been building for three thousand years. It has peaked now,
in hindsight inevitably and predictably, through the confluence of data and
information in every element of human thought and experience and psychology
at the deepest levels of our being, an inexorable upwelling of our
realevolution. The most psychotic and degenerate manifestation of this
crisis is the primitive and recurrent "my god is better than your god"
syndrome that has generated wars, crusades, jihads without end and is
clearly operational in the current international situation. In the context
of the new paradigm, this is clearly and simply the playing out of the
ancient Babel-factored situation.

What is retarding the situation is the godspell mentality, the
Babel-factoring of religions, the established patterns and cultures and
power structures, the tendency still to be subservient to authority, to look
to the outside for answers and "help". The situation is further complexified
by the fact that the very criteria bases, religion, philosophy, science and
the new age vision, that we have looked to for verification of the new are
themselves up for reinterpretation and transformation. There is little doubt
in my mind that the recognition and acceptance of this new world view, as
obvious and robust as it is for so many already, may take a hundred years
although, for those who have broken the godspell, the crises, problems,
conflicts, questions, all have had answers and been solved potentially, and
some, actually, for a long time. In a word: it's already all over.

From the most personal perspective, just about everything I've published on
this site, as advanced or "far out" depending on the reader's orientation as
it may seem, is ancient, not to make a bad pun. What we usually call "news",
about wars and rumors of wars, the fluctuations of the stock market,
political elections, scientific advances, etc. is, literally and
figuratively, against the backdrop of the new worldview, ancient history.
Until we restore our real history as generic humans and throw off the
Babel-factor influences that keep us separate and at odds, there will always
be the underlying potential for yet another theo-political conflict, war,
jihad, crusade, ethnic cleansing, tribal clash, oppression of minority,
religious persecution, economic or territorial aggression, broad scale
civilizational conflict. Conversely, new discoveries in ancient history, and
archaeological finds are significant news because they afford us vital
information to fill in the details of our restored, amazing past. New
scientific discoveries that enable us to understand the advanced science of
the Anunnaki are also critical: astronomy and genetics and physics have
contributed as much as archaeology.

Because of the immensity of the revolution in thought and behavior which is
clearly required, literally rethinking the planet, it at first almost
boggles the mind to envision in what way it can be and will be brought
about. I submit, however, that it is the gradual recognition of the alien
presence ( the UFO phenomenon in popular parlance) on and around the planet
which is the major factor already facilitating the implementation of the new
planetary paradigm. Just as archaeology has restored our real history,
astronomy has revealed how and from where an alien civilization could come
here and initiate that history, genetics has revealed the science by which
they initiated it, anthropology has facilitated our understanding of our
unique and precocious development, the alien presence compels humankind to
adjust to a stellar perspective and solar system travel becomes almost
trivial, our sophisticated roller skates on Mars rather boring. As Ronald
Reagan pointed out in five major addresses, including one at the U.N., any
perceived threat from the "outside" would bring all the nations of the world
together and our differences would all seem petty. As I have argued in the
white paper, The Alien Question, it is significant that both the alien
presence in general and our half-alien history are equally suppressed
because both threaten the position and power of the political and religious
elites. The revelation and acknowledgment of either diminishes the authority
and control of both. China, Belgium, Spain, Chile, Uruguay and and now
Mexico have officially acknowledged the alien presence; the United States
has not --- publicly and officially. It is paradoxical that the nation which
considers itself the most "advanced", modern nation in the world seemingly
has begun, after only 200 years, to lose its forward looking, pioneering
vision. When Cortez arrived in Mexico they mistook him for the "god" who
said he would return. It is rather obvious that they only made a mistake.
Mexico may become the teacher of the world when the Anunnaki, most likely
Enki, returns as promised and recorded in the Codexes when we are grown up
enough to again make contact.

This era of global transition will result in the redesign of the
fundamentals of human activity. People and organizations that look for new
ways to deal with unprecedented events will be better prepared to survive
and prosper. To be part of that group, you must be willing to unleash
yourself from the past and be willing to take risks. You must objectively
search for novel tools and perspectives. John Petersen
Part 1
The Status Quo: Totem and Taboos and You .... and I

Our planet, this agonizingly beautiful little planet, is on hold. Seeking
relief and release, in a perverse ecology we recycle outmoded, primitive
paradigms, shuffling our feathers-and-molasses confusion between hands. In a
time when we are required to deal with the politics of non-overlapping alien
realities, we are not able to resolve the separations caused by our
overlapping intra-species realities. It has rendered us theologically inane,
philosophically naive, scientifically cramped, socially isolated,
ecologically damaged, politically challenged and intellectually bewildered.

It is clearly evident, after thousands of years of trial and disastrous
errors, that the relief and release from our racially adolescent immaturity
we seek as individuals and as a planetary species will not come from yet
another econopolitical experiment, yet another U.N. negotiated conflict
resolution, religious ecumenical conference, new age vision, academic
philosophy, imposition of theocracy, new constitutional political format,
much less some new twist on the MAD scenario, or war to end all wars.

The purpose of this paper is to point out an overarching new paradigm that
redefines and, thereby, resolves and supercedes the most fundamental cause
of the divisions and conflicts between us and illuminates the now and future
trajectory of the new planetary human.

A very fundamental, critical question, therefore: Is it even possible to
arrive at an overarching new planetary paradigm so comprehensive and robust
that it corrects, subsumes, completes and outmodes all previous partial
paradigms, explains all our previous explanations, with the scope and power
to unify and pacify the planet? Unequivocally, yes. We are not incapable of
getting off "maybe". We are blocked only by primitive, antique legacies and
the way to expunge them from the fabric of our cultures is now available to
us.

How adolescent a species are we?

We are accustomed to analyze, evaluate and react to significant positive or
negative events in the public and private sectors in terms of political,
military, economic, scientific, psychological, sociological, or religious
factors and ramifications. We do this in the context of a primitive
economic, competitive mammalian politic based on territory and the defense
of limited survival resources when national boundaries have been rendered
meaningless and free energy sources are already available. The least evolved
among us, in a perversion of the word "conservative", preserve their wealth,
built on limited energy supply, by deliberately suppressing developments
that would make it limitless. As most current example, if confined to this
context of mammalian politics, we surely will see, the "end of the west" ---
the "wild", Paleolithic, west at least --- and the rise of the European
Union in its turn in the dreary cycles of competitive mammalian economics.
Then the "rise" of China, perhaps, etc., etc..

Politically, we have created governments peopled largely by the cynically
devolved, many sincere, perhaps, but myopic, in a time when sincerity alone
is tragically inadequate. We are still working through systems of
representation by strangers when direct, instantaneous input from the entire
population is quite possible. Representation, due to antiquated polling and
analytical methods, therefore produces mediocre politicians from the middle
of the demographic bell curve where the most votes lie. Domestically we are
a dead poet's society paralyzed and waiting perennially for the futant we
have probably already terminated at the stake, in the courtroom, the
boardroom, the lab, the dean's office, the classroom for violating a
taboo....

Ideologically, philosophically, the four criterion bases which we generally
use to determine the truth or falsity, beneficence or harmfulness, morality
or immorality of information, theology, philosophy, science and "new age"
values, rattle around in a criteria vacuum with little overlap and major
conflicts because each tends to define a human being and the meaning of
human existence in a quite different way. Among some humans, there is a
slinking cynicism, an often unspoken, viral attitude in human society that
holds the view that it is impossible to get out of the criteria vacuum, to
initialize a common ground; impossible to get past the communicatory
barriers of turf and custom, belief and taboo. When talking about the human
we are largely ineffectual because we are Babel-factored, literally talking
at each other about a different entity.

Technologically, we are eager and close to being able to create artificial
intelligence and consciousness, when we cannot agree on the nature of our
own consciousness.

"A people without history is not redeemed from time"
T. S. Eliot
How primitively adolescent are we? Most fundamentally and amazingly, we do
not have a consensual, planetary, generic definition of what a human being
is. We disagree about how we really came into existence, and what the nature
of our developmental process is. We disagree as to the facts and
interpretation and understanding of our species' history. We have treated
the sociobiological event of our beginning as a species as if we could never
be sure if it ever really occurred. We have not resolved nor integrated our
genesis and our history as a species and, therefore, are at a loss to
understood our real nature and future trajectory. That we do not see this as
a profound puzzle is further proof of our species primitive naiveté.

These problems translate to the problems that are related to our children
and their education. Currently, we matriculate our young, these amazing,
parallel- processing, relativistic, quantum jumping, multi-dimensional
consciousnesses, semi-illiterate and naive for fear of them questioning our
shambling senilities. In a time when we need to stretch our historical sense
to allow for the visitation of our planet by alien species from before our
origins, we teach them drum and trumpet mammalian history fleshed out with
desiccated, parochial, political platitudes. We teach our own children,
privately, generally the same platitudes and clichés we were taught and
brand them with the same religious, scientific, and intellectual taboos we
were tattooed with as children and expect that they will somehow be ready to
do better than we and perhaps even step into stellar society. Whether we
deny it our not, our children show all the signs of being ready; they are
underwhelmed and overqualified. We feel it. Nevertheless, we do not teach
our minors philosophy although they are capable of calculus. We do not allow
a teacher in the public school system to teach our children anything
important about anything important because we do not agree about what to
teach them, because we do not agree about who and what we are. We do not
educate our children in the management and refinement and evolution of their
personal spectrums of consciousness because we do not agree on what that
spectrum includes. And the children are literally our future, we in the
future.

The current status quo is revealed, therefore, at its most fundamental
strata, to be, simply a continuation of the primitive theo-political
conflicts that we have known for the past three thousand years. The major
obstacles that are most fundamentally influencing and hindering our
planetary understanding and progress are cultural legacies, cultural
lock-ins that are with us as the deepest dyes in the tapestries of our
cultures, locked in legacies that influence our thinking, our science, our
logic, and our concepts of ourselves. We are too close to them, or think
that they do not influence us, or that they have been dealt with in the
scientific or academic world long ago, or that we can just ignore them. We
deal, furthermore, with all these problems in a Paleolithic, turfish manner
from the isolated towers of Cartesian-Newtonian oligarchies.

It has been said that the world's most complex mechanism comes without an
owner's manual. We have many different and conflicting definitions of what a
human is and a number of conflicting "owner's manuals" by which a human is
supposed to operate. The word "owner" is the key: there are two major
"owner's manuals" in the form of Bible and Koran, two in the form of The
Book of Changes (The I Ching) and the Book of the Tao. The I Ching and the
Book of the Tao are instruction manuals in which the "owner" is understood
as the human consulting them. In the case of the Bible and the Koran the
"owners" are not the humans but the deities associated with the manuals.
This relationship of "owner" to subject, deity to servant or slave, is
understood by the vast majority as "religion". We hardly question this
concept. Those who do question it have often been killed by those who do
not. Those of one slave-code religion have often killed those of another
slave-code religion over whose owner is the only real Owner or which code is
the correct one. Ultimately, these slave-code definitions determine our
cultures and their legacies and traditions and are the most basic cause of
the separations, divisions, conflicts and wars between humans.

A Self-Indictment

Part 1, obviously, constitutes a very broad, serious and daunting
self-indictment. I posit a caveat: When I name names and institutions,
critically or otherwise, I intend them as part of us, as a self-indictment:
it is simply we doing these things to ourselves. Let us be easy on
ourselves, however, since we are the only game like us on the planet, the
only example we can work with, the inadequate conceptual boxes we inhabit
are of our making but also ours out of which to break. If these negatives
were all there were, then the fears of those in future shock would be
vindicated. If I had no suggestions, solutions, answers or resolutions to
offer I would not have written this paper. So the second half of this paper
respectfully offers an overview and paradigm that can take us, in the
perspective of a deepened knowledge of our species and ourselves, to a new
level of racial maturity and a degree of freedom previously unavailable. The
new synthesis subsumes partial glimpses of a new politic, humanistic new
world order, enlightened eco-economics, re-hashed Eastern or Western
mysticism, a third culture, spiritualized psychology, all knowledge united
in a grand consilience, or cerebral turning points. We now have the keys to
integrate our past with our present and future in the concept of generic
humanity, the critical factor for achieving planetary unity.

Part 2
1.

The Primary Key to Unlocking the Locked-in Legacies

"What is emerging now is a sense that something else -- neither mechanistic
(Darwin) nor theistic (the Bible) -- is going on. But mainstream science
will have none of this ambiguity, and reactively tars all non-Darwinian
notions with the broad brush of "biblical superstition." The net result has
become a sort of silly high drama in which one flavor of pseudoscience
attempts to do battle with another".
John Anthony West

While the evolutionists and the creationists have been battling it out
through dramatic episodes of the Scopes soaps, another explanatory paradigm
has been developing exponentially which subsumes, corrects, and makes
obsolete, specifically relative to the human species, both of those rather
primitive paradigms. While the scientific imperialists and the religious
dogmatists have thought that they owned the discussion by proprietarily
boxing the argument and defining the binary options, the Sumerian scholar,
Zecharia Sitchin, has advanced a robust and coherent paradigm of our genesis
and unique history that, if true, ----- and I am convinced that it is after
working critically with it for 28 years ----- is profound, comprehensive,
and fundamental enough to enable us to rewrite the entire history of our
beginnings and the planet astronomically, evolutionarily, paleontologically,
archaeologically and, literally, redefine ourselves as humans. Sitchin's
thesis illuminates that antique conflict with Nobel prize quality research,
renders the, by now, Monty Pythonesque arguments outmoded, subsumes and
corrects creationism, redefines Darwinism as well as its latter day
detractions. He has been able to do this because he reads Sumerian as well
as the Semitic languages including ancient and Modern Hebrew, and is steeped
in the history. He has had the advantage of access to the accumulated
scholarship and archaeological material from the Middle East rediscovered
only in the last one hundred and fifty years.

Our Genesis Revisited: The Sitchin Paradigm
For a more complete and detailed synopsis of the Sitchin thesis, the context
and historical background needed to understand it, the proofs of its
validity and scientific objections regarding it answered, see Appendix A
Zecharia Sitchin, one of two hundred Sumerian scholars on the planet who can
read a cuneiform clay tablet like you and I can read a newspaper, has
demonstrated that the Anunnaki/Nefilim (Sumerian/Hebrew: those who came down
[from the heavens] ) , the transcultural “gods” known to all the ancient
civilizations from the tenth planet in our solar system, Nibiru, colonized
Earth 432,000 years ago and created the human species 200,000 years ago, by
genetically crossing their genes with Homo Erectus. Corroboration comes from
evidence for Planet X/Nibiru from the Naval Observatory , the Infrared
search by the IRAS satellite in `83-’84; genetically from the mitochondrial
DNA “search for Eve”; anthropologically from the “out of Africa” data
placing our genesis in Central Africa 200,000 years; enigmatic ooparts and
close to two million pieces of artifact and documentation recovered directly
from the ancient civilizations. Our modern science has provided a means of
identifying advanced science in the ancient past previously thought of as
fantastic even for us. The advances in our scientific discoveries in
genetics, mitochondrial DNA research, space and planetary science,
archaeology, paleontology, anthropology, and linguistics as well as even the
physics of metallurgy have enabled Sitchin to demystify the advanced
technologies of the Anunnaki and identify and explain ooparts . We have
progressed from being their slave animals to limited partnership and, since
they phased off Earth, are now phasing out of a 3000 year traumatic
transition to racial independence, a rapid metamorphic process, under the
imperative of our advanced Nefilim genetic component.

Central to the history of the Anunnaki’s occupation of the planet was the
interaction between two brothers, Enlil and Enki. Enki was their chief
scientist who was responsible, with his sister Ninhursag, their chief
medical officer, for the genetic creation of our species. Enki, obviously,
was sympathetic towards humans and promoted our interests and us. Enlil,
eventually known as Jehovah/YHWH, of the Old Testament, maintained the
position that humans were to remain slaves, totally subservient to the
Anunnaki and him especially.

The Traumatic Transition

The Anunnaki phased off this planet at the latest around 1250 B.C. For some
three thousand years, subsequently, we humans have been going through a very
traumatic transition to racial independence. Proprietary claims made by
various groups of humans as to who knew and knows what we should be doing to
get the Anunnaki to return or when they returned, perpetuated the palace and
social rituals learned under the Anunnaki and sometimes disagreement and
strife broke out between them. Religious ritual is the transmutation of
palace servant duties. The serving of favorite roasted meats on the Anunnaki
table became the offering of “burnt offerings” on the table now become an
“altar”, the transportation of the Anunnaki local ruler on a dais became a
procession of statues, the Anunnaki palaces became “temples”, etc. The
Anunnaki were, clearly and unambiguously, known to the humans who were in
contact with them as imperfect, flesh and blood humanoids (taller and
huskier than we, male and female, the males bearded. We look like they look
because we are half Anunnaki). It was only much later that the Anunnaki were
eventually sublimated into cosmic character and status and, later on,
conveniently mythologized. Breaking the godspell has seen us go through the
stages of abandonment to dissociation, transmutation, religion, rebellion
and now to recovery. We have been dysfunctionally looking to the sky where
they went for some three thousand years caught in cargo cult religions. We
are ready to step out of racial adolescence.

Ramifications and Resolutions

The “occult” is time-release packages of advanced technological information
entrusted to us in “crash courses” in civilization, often lost through time,
now being recovered through the clues and recognition afforded by our own
science. Ooparts, high-tech tools, toys, artifacts, “out of place” in time
are remnants of lost technology and knowledge. Transcendental experience is
redefined in terms of dimensional expansion of consciousness and perception.
We are rapidly evolving to habitual four-dimensional consciousness.
Transcendence is conscious metamorphic dimensional exploration,
participatory expansion at the leading edge of our special-case evolution.
The totems and taboos of our racial adolescence dispelled, Prometheus can
get off his rock and reach genetic satori; Job can get off his dung heap and
complete his EST training; Buddha can open his eyes and reach genetic
enlightenment.

Mythology is our greatest myth. We can move beyond the interpretation of the
gods as myth, Jungian archetypes, and schizophrenic hallucinations. History
as hallucination and “mythinformation”, after two hundred years of
explanatory failure, although still hiding behind tenure in the university
and between the glossy pages of new age magazines, is a dead issue.

Why is the Sitchin paradigm so pivotal? It is the meta-paradigm that affords
the potential to remove the resultant, stultifying, locked-in legacies that
have kept up separate and enervated for millennia. The new paradigm is so
encompassing and penetrating that it is a unique meta-wild card: it
redefines every cardinal element of human existence that we think we have
understood including a redefinition of our evolution, all our cultures, our
religions and of our very selves.

Those who talk of a singularity, a shearing drop to extreme novelty and
fundamental revolutionary change at some near point in our future that is so
profound that it will change human nature do not have to look any further
than the Sitchin paradigm. It is there for the acceptance and it will
rewrite the entirety of our history and redefine human nature. After a
century and a half of examination and attempted explanation —- and
suppression —- of the historical, archaeological, anthropological and
astronomical evidence accumulated, no other explanatory paradigm comes close
to the totally coherent, robust and logical Sitchin thesis. Can and will it
be improved or corrected? Certainly.

Just within the time of the writing of this paper there has been a report of
the discovery, by satellite scan, of a city, two miles by fivemiles in area,
under thirty feet of water in the ocean twenty five miles off the northwest
coast of India. Preliminary carbon dating of dredged materials from the site
indicate its age as nine thousand years old, placing it earlier than Sumer.
The histories of India (declared myth by the British because they were older
than the Empire) speak in detail about civilizations and humans in the very
remote past and mention this city by name.

What appears to be a city has been reported off the coast of Cuba under an
astounding 2100 feet of water, discovered by professional treasure wreck
hunters using sophisticated equipment.

The Takenouchi documents and artifacts, ancient treasure of the Japanese
Emperor guarded for 2500 years by the family of the highest Shinto priest
caste family, speak of an alien civilization coming here from space and
founding the human race.
All these facts and histories need to be studied thoroughly and integrated
with the histories and data from the entire planet. We have much work to do.
The planetary benefits will be enormous. Besides the obvious general
advantage of working from a consensual understanding and definition of what
a generic human is, we can eliminate the characterizations of the perennial
conflicts as being between “progress and piety” or between creationism and
evolution, or science and faith. The new paradigm finally and conclusively
resolves the creation-evolutionary conflict specifically concerning our
unique genesis. If the new paradigm is substantially correct then the box is
illusory, the creationists are only half wrong and the evolutionists are
only half right: there was a creation but it took place in a genetic
laboratory; there is a human evolutionary process but it was interrupted by
the Anunnaki inserting their genes into the Homo Erectus gene code, a very
pragmatic, non-Darwinian kind of interference. We were created and we are
evolving but both in unique ways.

In short: the entire set of world views, theistic, theo-political, cultural,
philosophical and scientific that purport to explain our genesis, history,
and development as a species are about to be replaced as we recover finally
from racial amnesia. The revolution is inevitable. It will take probably a
century to fully accomplish socially because of the sweepingly profound
nature of the resulting change, the natural resistance of the established
institutions, and the need to reeducate and transition without
disorientation. The new world view is gradually taking hold, cannot be
ignored, and is waiting in the wings. It is only a matter of time. A unique
and vital characteristic is that it addresses and explains and redefines the
root source of all the ancient religions of the world on a common basis so
that no particular religion can claim privileged status of any kind.
Religion, as we know it, will be understood in the context of our unique
history.

The significance and ramifications of this tremendous body of work,
correlated with findings from all other disciplines, as they bear on our
present and future, has been my primary focus since 1976 when I began work
on Breaking the Godspell, the reaction to which has been predictable and
certainly not boring.

There is no better example of the Galileo effect (we will not look through
your telescope because we know what you say you see can’t be so) in the
academic and scientific arenas than the reaction to the Sitchin paradigm.
Campus, scientific, and theological imperialism and the fields of
anthropology, archaeology, and astronomy, particularly, have tried all the
usual unprofessional, unscholarly, shunning, chest thumping, fang baring,
proprietary turf posturing and ad hominem attacks through teeth clenched in
tenure tetanus, but the thesis becomes more and more robust as new evidence
comes in continually from archaeology, anthropology, astronomy, genetics and
other disciplines. If Darwin’s thesis was a blockbuster, Sitchin’s thesis is
a hydrogen bomb. We may have been able to afford to dally with Darwin and
defer to religion for as long as we have but the rapid changes in modern
times will force us to consider Sitchin’s thesis seriously and intensely on
a much shorter basis.

Still Dallying with Darwin

Of course, most scientists and sophisticated scholars consider themselves
enlightened in that they espouse some form of Darwinian evolutionary theory
as the party line, although there are serious arguments even within the
scientific arena as to the full validity of the Darwinian thesis. Generally,
philosophers and scientists apologize if they think they are even possibly
sounding like creationists, spend most of their energy in either
promulgating some version of Darwinian evolution or attacking what they
judge to be its too radical application, get entangled in arguments about
whether Darwinian evolution can be invoked to explain human creativity, even
aesthetics, and generally put down any other explanation out of hand.

The general thesis of the evolutionist, therefore, reads like this: the
acceptance of evolution as the mechanism by which we came about causes us to
understand that we are a collection of biological molecules, interacting
with each other as in a mechanism, according to well defined laws and rules
derived from physics and chemistry —- although not all known or understood
by humans as yet. Defining consciousness within this biological model is
still a pivotal problem: some say it is simply an epiphenomenon, an effect
of the operation of all the parts of the brain working in consort, some say
it is the subjective self-perception of herself or himself by the
individual, some say it must be based in some “new stuff”, some new physics
or chemistry that we don’t yet understand.

Across the general population, however, we do not even agree on whether we
are evolving, what the process really is if, indeed, we are evolving, from
what source and how we began, and in what direction and on what trajectory,
whatever that process is, we are headed. We do not agree, even more
fundamentally, as to what criteria to use to judge these matters. We are not
discussing the same entity. Creationists, obviously, do not think of humans
as having evolved in the past or as evolving in the present. If we do not
agree that we are evolving, can evolve, or whether any evolution of a
species or individual must be by mindless Darwinian mechanisms, or whether
there are effective methodologies for expediting conscious self evolution,
we will continue to be at standstill. It is quite ironical, however, that
even most of those who hold for some evolutionary view of humankind evolving
to human status in the past do not seem to think in terms of humans evolving
in the present, much less having a well defined conceptualization of what
that process might be.

Charles Darwin published his arguments for evolution in 1859, one hundred
and forty three years ago. Schliemann opened the buried Pandora’s box of our
real archaeological history in 1873, one hundred and twenty four years ago.
Sitchin, having gained the advantage of discoveries in archaeology,
astronomy, space travel, genetics and linguistics as elucidating and
explanatory tools, published first only in 1976, already over a quarter
century ago. Using this rough chronology as a guide, we might anticipate,
even with some exponential bit of acceleration, that the initial general
recognition and acceptance of the Sitchin paradigm will not happen for,
perhaps, some fifty years. We really can’t afford, however, to see Kuhn’s
thesis that scientific revolutions take place only by the old guard dying
off rather than by an acceptance through careful study, critique and proving
out, borne out once again.

Bicameral Genetics As Sociobiology 1A

In searching for a word to clearly distinguish between the various Darwinian
type theories of evolution usually applied to all species including ours,
and our unique evolution as revealed by our history, science and genetics I
have found it convenient to invent the word “Realevolution” . Clearly we are
evolving but in an accelerated, unique way after coming into existence
through a genetic engineering project. That we have adapted loosely in a
Darwinian sense over time is also true but the fact that we realize we can
control and manipulate our realevolutionary progress and direction goes far
beyond the concept of natural selection by chance genetic mutations.

Consider the facts of our unique genetics and differences from any other
anthropoid or humanoid. Current investigation says our genetics are about 98
percent the same as a chimp’s. Regardless, that two, perhaps only one
percent obviously makes a vast difference. We have 46 chromosomes, primates
have 48 and the fusion of the second and third chromosomes in primates is a
mystery. Even today, the anthropological sector is scrambling to find a
viable ancestor species for us; Homo Erectus is currently being promoted. We
were contemporaneous with Neanderthals or even preceded them. We showed up
too suddenly in the chronology of the fossil record. We present with very
many startling, obvious differences from primates, and those differences,
suddenly appearing in our species, are radical: we have foreheads, hardly
any brow ridges, eye sockets far more rectangular than round; relatively
tiny nasal passages; small flat mouths and a chin; far less muscular
strength and bone density; our skin, sweat process and glands, body hair,
throats, and salt management are completely different. Human females do not
have an estrus cycle. We are bipedal. Our brains are remarkably different to
say the very least. It becomes quite obvious why we (as a product of a
melding of two racial gene codes where quality control was conditioned by
pragmatic purposes) have some four thousand genetic defects and counting
rather than none to a handful as all other species, in light of the
complexity of the merging. Homo erectus, our half ancestor, took a million
years to go from rough flaked stone tools to smooth ones. You could hardly
notice any change. We have come from square one to going to Mars in only
some 200,000 years. If the Sitchin paradigm is correct, all these facts are
explained easily. If we ignore this body of information as we read out and
work with the human genome we handicap ourselves unnecessarily and deprive
ourselves of valuable clues and understanding. Darwinian principles may
generally apply to hominid species before us but they clearly do not apply
to our unique synthetic genesis and subsequent development except as a minor
theme in our climatic and incidental regional adaptations.

If the Anunnaki were interested only in engineering what clearly amounted to
disposable units then it may reasonably be inferred that the completeness of
the engineering would not have to have been taken to the maximum. This is,
in the opinion of this author, the basis for the four thousand plus genetic
diseases and defects we present. It has been argued, theoretically, that,
although the vast majority of the species on this planet present with only a
few typical genetic diseases, we show 4000 because of the relative
complexity of our organism. However, we are not that much more complex
genetically than even the higher primates and this argument does not hold.

Sociobiology, as introduced and propounded by E. O. Wilson, is founded on
Darwinian evolutionary theory, and the “unappealing proposition” that
genetic variation and chance are the only cause for the existence of human
kind, inferring a complete biological determinism. There is difficulty,
however, in accounting for the disconcertingly rapid accelerations obvious
in our species’ brief history in which the slow genetic mutational and
chance factors have been rapidly outrun by our cultural and consciousness
developments. It may well be that we are totally determined in our action
and thought by our biology but the very fact that we can recognize that
possibility and discuss it begs the question How then are we determined?
Wilson’s honesty causes him to acknowledge that we have reached a point
where we can consciously influence the course of our evolution. The new
paradigm affords a context and perspective in which to understand our
species’ precocity in terms of the rapid ascendance or our advanced Anunnaki
genetic base. We can return to the subject of man’s ultimate nature with
confidence, freedom to radically experiment and explore with understanding
and humor. The same reductionistic science that would honestly insist that
we are totally determined by an infinitely regressive loop of ultimately
quantum mechanical events is already telling us that we are determined to
transcend in an infinitely progressive loop of fractal like expansions. If
we are totally determined, we are clearly determined to determine our own
determinism.

The fact that we have modified since our inception according to Darwinian
adaptations to general climatic, regional and cultural vectors becomes a
minor theme in the overview of ourselves as the precocious leading edge of a
synthesized species metamorphosing rapidly, driven by our bicameral genetic
engine. The “unappealing proposition” loses its sting: the truth, regardless
of its content, tends to set one free. The new paradigm explains completely
the seeming anomalies of acceleration, ooparts and syncretisms so apparent
in the human situation, and is a definitive explanation of why our species’
“biological evolution is always quickly outrun by cultural change”.

A Planetary Focus for the Genome Project and Genetic Research

The Sitchin paradigm provides a comprehensive context in which to understand
and explain the enigmatic facts and anthropological anomalies of the
Darwinian model of our species existence, which we have already amassed. It
provides the context and data for bringing the efforts of geneticists and
the genome projects, often scattered for a variety of reasons, to a focus on
correcting and perfecting the genetic code, eliminating all disease and
handicaps, and providing us the option of immortality.

Immortality is a pivotal topic in all considering and learning from all
phases of the Anunnaki-human history. We know, directly from the records, of
their decisions that the Anunnaki did not give us the relatively extreme
longevity or immortality they possessed by conscious deliberate decision. It
did not fit their purposes: we were invented as slave workers. The records
also show, however, that, over time, a handful of humans were granted
immortality also by deliberate decision as a reward for being good
subordinates in various roles usually as kings/foremen or for carrying out
some critical mission. Another lesson: there may well be identifiable gene
sequences that control the aging and dying process that are clearly and
definitely manipulatable giving indication that we will be able to rectify
their possible deliberate suppression.

During the genetic investigations now in process, therefore, it would be
valuable indeed for geneticists, at the minimum, to be constantly inspecting
the results of the decipherment for signs of the genetic merging, and to
develop protocols to determine such, if needed, as well as following the
clues mentioned herein. By doing so, interpretations and explanations may
possibly be facilitated, progress accelerated and a far more comprehensive
overview of the genome achieved. The information gained would be,
reciprocally, a major, pivotal, invaluable resultant spin-off contribution
to our species’ evolutionary, anthropological, and cultural generic history.
Understanding our bicameral gene code in the context of the new paradigm
will facilitate the elimination of the schizoid puzzles in our collective
and individual psyches and the correction and perfecting of our genetics.

Immortality, An Emergent Wild Card

How primitive are we? The view from 2100 says very primitive indeed: we are
only beginning to approach the time when all diseases are preventable and
curable. We still pollute our environment and cause ourselves disease. We
have not overcome aging and death and are afraid of immortality. We get
born, no owner’s manual, to often dubiously qualified, puzzled and puzzling
parents, subject to a multitude of diseases, struggle to make sense out of
what the hell existence on this planet in this universe is all about and how
to deal with it, wonder why there are so many conflicting philosophies and
institutions claiming cosmic franchising and, often, why the universe seems
so unfair and then we die. We are generally conditioned by theocultural
traditions to accept these bizarre conditions as “normal”‘ and the will of
some god.

If we rethink our situation in terms of our restored history, however,
things make a great deal more sense although, for now, there may not be a
planetary cure or relief for some of them. If we recognize that we are the
product of a genetically engineered melding of two quite different gene
codes, literally a bicameral species, displaying a decidedly non-Darwinian
kind of evolutionary development, just now beginning to step out of racial
adolescence, only now beginning to grasp our racial psychology, possessing a
gene code that, significantly and disconcertingly, manifests four thousand
and counting potential genetic defects, struggling desperately with a short
life span and certain mortality, we will know precisely who and what we are.
By enabling us to break the godspell we are freed to collectively work
toward planetarily common goals in genetic science: the correction of the
defects in our genetic code, the elimination of diseases in all of mankind,
the providing of the option of immortality to all.

In the greatest perspective, perhaps we should recognize from the outset
that immortality will be both a new and awesome plateau of human existence
offering as yet probably undreamed potential and yet, without denigrating
that potential at all, ultimately just another “trip”, just another step in
our meta-evolution, the rapid metamorphosis we have been undergoing since
our beginning. Within those extremes there is the greatest latitude for the
inevitable expansion into dimensions which will allow us to become far
wiser, individually, through greater experience, greater learning, and the
ability to witness the patterns of repetitions of extended periodicity.
Eliminating the pressure of a short life span that influences our choices
and cramps our lives will not just give us the practical potential to travel
easily between star systems and send the insurance companies into the
re-edit mode; it will change our perspective and our social interactions,
certainly the entirety of human existence, radically.

Beyond Religion and The Old New Age

Imagine, even no religion,
They say I’m a dreamer,
But I’m not the only one.
John Lennon

Over the last 2000 years we have seen scientific or pseudoscientific
doctrines espoused by the various religions being contradicted or demolished
and the religions, repeatedly, although with great delay, change their
positions with regard to our genesis, history, evolution and science, and
modify their doctrines. But the new paradigm addresses the very root
doctrines, positions, claimed divine franchise and authority of all the
religions of the world and will eventually cause the obsolescence of all
institutionalized religions springing from our ancient relationship of
subservience to the Anunnaki.

Religion, as we know it, is the transmutation of the Anunnaki-human
relationship of master-subject servitude, of slavery and then limited,
subservient partnership, the godspell. The concept of God, capital G, has
gradually developed through the cosmification of the various Anunnaki rulers
Enlil (Jehovah/YHWH), Enki (Adonai, the Lord), Allah (El/Nannar/Sin), among
others, gradually embellished with the heady concepts of metaphysical
speculation. It has lately become a sort of faux ecumenical gloss: the TV
news quotes the Koran as saying “There is no God but God” when it should be
“There is no god but Allah”, a completely different meaning. The god of the
Judeo-Roman Christian tradition, Jehovah YHWH was – quite possibly still is
— the flesh and blood Anunnaki individual, Enlil, eventually cosmified into
the absolute creator of the universe, eventually spoken of as infinite love,
infinite justice, infinite this or infinite that, through the bishops and
the scholastic philosophers and theologians.

The Concept of “God”

The idea of a cosmic, infinite principle “God”, as many of us still take it
for granted, is a thoroughly mixed composite concept of the sublimation of
the anthropomorphic and imperfect Anunnaki individuals, the “deities” of
slave code religions; metaphysical abstractions accumulated over time
through the speculations of the revered philosophers from the Greeks onward;
the Hellenic influenced, theo-philosophical teachings of the Roman Church
scholastic tradition and mystics; flavored with the concepts of theists,
deists, agnostics, theosophists and mystics of any number of sects; and
thoroughly leavened by the concepts of the consciousness expanding
disciplines and metaphysical doctrines of the East, sprinkled with our own
individual intellectual and emotional subjective variations and usually
still conditioned by the godspell element of subservience. But that
cosmified, composite, intellectual abstraction is not the Jehovah/YHWH or
Jesus of the Judeo-Christian religions, the Prime Mover of Thomas Aquinas or
the Omega point of De Chardin, the Allah of the Muslim faith, the Brahma of
Hinduism, the Buddha, or the Tao or deity of the religion of your choice.
RETURN TO OVERVIEW
Many who do not realize this crucial distinction, do not want to, or are not
ready to, take refuge in the Big-G little-g syndrome, a sort of halfway
shelter on the way to genetic enlightenment. That position is articulated
as, “I see the real historical nature of the “gods”, the little “g’s”, but
that does not shake my belief in a Big G”. That way they can still subscribe
to the platitudes that the “God of all religions” is beyond individual
doctrinal differences and contradictory theologies, “all paths lead to the
same God” and similar inane notions. The new paradigm affords us the
opportunity to sort all these elements out, identify the different
individual real gods of the various religions, place them and ourselves in
historical perspective and recognize the metaphysical conceptualizations of
“deity”, East and West, as a product of our own evolving racial psychology.
RETURN TO OVERVIEW

Yes, the new paradigm means that religion and religions, as we know them,
will have to bow out. The godspell phenomenon has two parts: we need to
overcome the slave mentality of dependence and subservience and we need to
discard the institutional religions which sprang from and dominated through
it, especially the radical fundamentalism, West and East, that is ultimately
tearing the race apart. The role of the theologian then becomes the
facilitating of planetary reconciliation in the transition to the time
beyond religion.

The institutional, slave-code, godspell religions, have fixed dogmas which
are directly contradicted by the new paradigm. They claim divine franchise
by gods who are now radically redefined. They claim absolute authority over
the disciplines that produce the information that would demonstrate their
true historical nature. The ultimate driving force will most probably be a
degree of desperation and desire for peace gradually manifesting in the
entire planetary population so strong that it will cause an abandonment of
the authoritarian leaders and dogmas of the religions, followed by a younger
generation of clerics who will recognize the inevitable and introduce new
interpretations and relaxed rules to gradually smooth the phase out and
transition, hopefully to humanitarian organizations and peace movements. The
signs of transition of some religious organizations to charitable and
ecological focus may be seen as an almost inchoate beginning of this kind of
transformation. It would also be foolish not to expect diehard
fundamentalist backlash.

Is this atheism? No, paradoxically, not as such. Not as we have defined
atheism previously as the denial of the existence of any kind of god, cosmic
or otherwise. It simply is a long overdue correction of some local,
intra-solar system politics, relatively rather pedestrian in cosmic
perspective. Garden variety atheism can now be understood as an early sign
of precocious species adolescent rebellion and questioning of the authority
of the obviously all too humanoid characteristics of whatever sublimated
local Anunnaki “god” is still the object of worship (the original meaning of
worship was “work for”: AVOD = work). Yes, the subservient godspell
religious stage will be surpassed. The resultant freedom, however, will
engender and foster greater curiosity about reality and a seeking for
ultimate causes far more metaphysically adequate and commensurate with our
expanding consciousness far beyond even the search for the Law of
Everything. The element of transcendence associated with some religions will
be, at minimum, understood as generic consciousness expansion into higher
and higher dimensionality.

Neither is this materialistic reductionism although it does force us to
reconsider the notion of the “spiritual”. What is needed is a complete
overhaul of all our metaphors and concepts of the “spiritual” because the
great majority of them are embedded in our cultural fabric and consciousness
as leftovers from Judeo-Roman Catholic theology and second hand Eastern
philosophies. The importance of this overhaul is critical because it
involves the concepts of mind, consciousness, intelligence, will,
self-awareness, transcendence, dimensionality, self.

Beyond The Babel Factor: Human Over-Unity

The new paradigm is the basis, perhaps the only adequate basis, for a
profound unification of all humanity. Not some superficial token ecumenicism
or social homogenization of peoples and cultures and philosophies but a
unification that frees us to be one species and explains and enhances our
diversity of adaptations and cultures and contributions. The cumulative
evidence and restored history has enabled us to grasp the true nature of our
genetic creation, our traumatic transition, and the opportunity to emerge
from species adolescence and amnesia into species maturity. All the
political, economic, social, scientific, new age, evolutionary variables are
only symptomatic; the genetic level is where the profound realization must
blossom. The restoration of our generic history and a generic definition of
what a human is afford us the advancement that will take the planet off
hold.

The Current Grand Moment

This is the end game of an age, be certain. A new human and a new
civilization beyond religion and the old new age are on the horizon. I
submit that the most fundamental, profound, overarching, sociological
transformation we are going through at this point in our history is the
change from the theo-politically controlled and manipulated explanations of
our beginnings and history to species independence. We are witnessing the
last gasp of religious fundamentalism worldwide. Whether we chose to
acknowledge it or not, we are already well into one of “…. those Grand
Moments when the whole scale of being is reevaluated” as John Petersen has
characterized it. It is within these redefinitions that the resolutions to
the problems and obstacles deeply embedded in our species’ and individual
psyches’ are to be found. To paraphrase Dylan Thomas rather crudely, let us
not go blind into that daylight. But how do we accomplish the transition
from our current planetary standstill to planetary consensus gracefully and
quickly? It’s best to recognize from the outset that the revolution
required, the meta-wild card so radical in its implications and
ramifications and requirements, that there is no single discipline, no
institution, certainly no individual or group who can bring it about alone.
It is so planetarily encompassing that stepping outside of this box is
almost impossible. The change will have to come from within.

Science, the closest we have come to a common ground, a common criterion,
has played and will continue to play a pivotal role in the recognition and
acceptance of the new worldview.

Astronomy will demonstrate the existence of the tenth planet unequivocally
— the IRAS, Infrared Imaging Satellite, quite obviously discovered it in
`83-’84 — and, reluctantly, recognize the correspondence of the details
gradually accumulated with the ancient data we now possess. The curiosity
about the existence of the Anunnaki on Nibiru/Planet X will become
overwhelming and contact through spacecraft and signaling will commence.

Archaeology, for the last one hundred and fifty years, has been making the
major contributions of data and will continue to do so. Only recently, the
science of genetics has been able to refine, sometimes correct,
archaeological and anthropological estimates and dating. Because of the
intertwining of the archaeological and genetic information concerning our
unique genesis, genetics has already and should continue to be a major tool
and contributing science to the new paradigm.

The more robust the scientific information becomes the easier it will be for
the religions of the world to accept and incorporate. Nations and cultures
as well will see the cogency of the information and gradually accept it,
becoming gradually more planetary in outlook.

In the name of world unity and peace, governments and contributing entities
should increase funding of the scientific searches and research in these
disciplines and adopt policies that will release the information, some of it
quite certainly withheld at this time, already possessed.

Gardner’s Contribution: Western Culture Revisited

A major contribution to the resolution of the conflicts between the
religions of Western culture in this regard is the work of Sir Laurence
Gardner. Sitchin’s work and the major discoveries of the Dead Sea Scrolls,
has enabled Gardner, an English genealogist—historian to make a recent
breakthrough. Gardner has the advantage of one hundred and fifty years of
discovery and translation of the Sumerian source material, knowledge of
Anunnaki politics and the interaction of Enki and Enlil implemented by the
latest scholarship on the Dead Sea Scrolls and Nag Hamadi documents through
the brilliant work of the Australian theologian, Barbara Thiering . Working
as a genealogist with data available through privileged access to the
private archives of thirty European royal family clients, Gardner has
brought to light the fact that there exists a robust, highly documented,
genealogical, genetic history of a special bloodline carrying all the way
back to the Anunnaki and Sumeria. This information, possessed by the
heterodox tradition of Christianity, which is only now coming forward, no
longer fearful of the boiling oil of the Inquisition, has always been
available. He has identified the Holy Grail as this bloodline of humans,
enhanced by Enki with additional Anunnaki genes, intended to be human
leader-rulers in a tradition of “servants of the people” traceable all the
way back to Sumer. The modern word Grail traces back to graal, san graal,
which, etymologically, stems from the Sumerian root words GRA AL, meaning
special bloodline. The bloodline of human leaders, further enhanced with
Anunnaki genes, initiated by Enki (The Lord, Adonai), passed from Sumer
through Egypt to Israel through David and the messiahs (anointed ones),
fostered by the Essene communities as revealed in the Dead Sea Scrolls.
Jesus was an Essene in the bloodline as was Mary Magdalene. They were man
and wife and had children. Jesus was of a liberal persuasion within that
tradition.

This strain of Hellenistic, liberal, Judaism eventually became known as
heterodox Christian (the word Christian was not coined until almost four
hundred years later) was opposed by the Pauline branch which eventually
allied itself with Rome and became the Roman Church. The orthodox Roman
Church perpetuated the slave-code fear and subservience tradition and, in
its turn, suppressed, persecuted and brutalized the human centered strain of
the bloodline. The reason why women have always been denigrated and
suppressed by the Roman Church is genetic: the bloodline was dependent on
transmission through the women of the line and any recognition of them would
be recognition of the line. This is a further elucidation of our genetic
background. It is manifestly unjust that the geneticist is deprived of this
vital block of information about the genome due to the preclusive attitude
of the “bishops” still reigning in archaeology. We are the product of that
Nefilim technology, a mutant species with bicameral genetics, bicameral
mind. We can finally integrate both halves of our nature. Our Homo Erectus
component will bring us back to harmony with this planet, making it a nice
place to live and a nice place to visit. Our Anunnaki component will teach
us how to move off planet gracefully. The word from station DNA is these
“gods” wear designer genes.
Part 3

1. The New Human

We need to think about what it is like to be a member of a synthesized
species which is going through a special case of evolution, a rapid
metamorphosis, where we can actually determine our own evolutionary
direction, when the ramifications of that unthinkable thought are now about
to bring about a turning point in our history. It is about the new
civilization we are about to create out of the new planetary vision.

Let us postulate that we have broken the godspell, we have arrived at a
consensual, planetary, understanding and definition of the generic human as
a genetically engineered species now coming out of racial adolescence into
species first maturity, the individual cognizant of the ability to control
and direct the nature and trajectory of his and her own personal evolution
and able and expected to contribute to the collective consciousness and
determination of the racial evolutionary trajectory.

The awareness and comprehension of this fundamental, generic, racial self
knowledgeI have called genetic enlightenment. By “genetic enlightenment” I
mean what it is like once you have broken the godspell, the deepest dye in
the fabrics of both Eastern and Western culture. Many seemingly enigmatic
items are resolved and there is a great deal to be done. It becomes
immediately clear that we can move beyond both eastern and western metaphor;
beyond religion, atheism, the old new age; beyond Jungian archetypal and
mythological interpretation, beyond our strange, dangerous and contradictory
mix of mammalian, turfish, violent theo-political politics and compassionate
ideals. We will finally be ready for alien contact and interaction and
matriculation into stellar society. We can reach a planetary unity we have
never known before and a peace so profound it will be almost humorous. How
long will it take? Probably as long as we have lived under our Constitution.

The Trajectory of Realevolution

A cardinal result of our confusion about who and what we are causes us to be
at a loss as to what the thrust and direction, the trajectory of that
evolutionary dynamic might be. When we, collectively, recognize the validity
of the new paradigm and restore our true history to ourselves we will gain a
critical major advantage in that we will be positioned to understand not
only our unique synthetic nature but our unique evolutionary trajectory.
This will mark a cardinal turning point in our history.

Once the locked-in, slave-code legacies and the conflicts they engender,
both species wise and in the individual, are seen for what they really are,
it becomes clear that the thrust, the direction, of our Realevolution is
toward greater and greater expansion of freedom, compassion, understanding,
cooperation, intelligence, consciousness, dimensional perception, conscious
personal and species orchestration and control. It raises and enhances the
individual’s level of importance, the scope of the individual’s choices and
enlarges the arena of exploration. It points towards immortality and beyond,
to transforms of our nature hardly imaginable now. The message is that
liberated human nature and existence is open ended, forward creative,
poetic, rhapsodic, expanding, exciting and enticing.

The Demographics of Our Realevolution

The evolutionary demographic profile of the species, at any given time,
tends to be that of a bell curve. The segments of the bell curve are
composed of gene pools with different focuses and different functions.
Perhaps two percent of the population, at any given time, will be located at
the very leading edge of the curve. These are the futants, those who are
genetically programmed to be the evolutionary scouts of future dimensions,
scenarios, and potentials. Rather than kill them, jail them, shun them, we
had better learn to recognize their function, sort out the valuable parts of
their reports of the future, and honor their contribution to the
evolutionary progress of our species.

IQ Meets CQ….and EQ?

Genetic enlightenment will afford derivative major advantages in psychology,
sociology, and education.

Once recognizing the nature and direction of our realevolution we will be
positioned to understand the details of its mechanism. The current agenda of
the DNA intelligence is to produce neurological systems that can use
themselves as an instrument and bodies sophisticated enough to house them.
There are a number of survival functions necessary to protect, preserve, and
further that goal and the species. These functions are accomplished by
specific gene pools of individuals. Individual, personal realevolution
recapitulates the realevolution of our species and this involves the
individual moving through different gene pools at different ages and stages.
Education is most effectively accomplished in gene pool contexts at the time
the child, adolescent or adult is evolving through or specializing in a
particular gene pool.

IQ, intelligent quotient is defined in realevolutionary terms as an estimate
of the degree of proficiency of an entity to receive, process, transmit
information from external and internal sources, testable and measurable
against a relative peer scale.

Just as one can test to determine if an entity possesses some degree of
intelligence so one can test to determine if an entity has some degree of
consciousness. Just as with intelligence, once determined in an entity, one
can devise relative criteria and scales to measure the extent of the
spectrum of awarenesses and the degree and focus of each kind of awareness,
its integration and the degree of conscious use by the entity of its input
and data. Let us call this the consciousness quotient: CQ.

How primitive are we still? Tests for a consciousness quotient, CQ, do not
seem to be a concept with which our collective consciousness is comfortable
just yet. Not just a test to determine a verifiable state of awareness. Not
just a test to see if we can be Turinged by some program or entity. A test
of consciousness quotient would determine the entire range of awarenesses of
the entity, human or otherwise, and the degree of development and intensity,
quality and focus of each part of that spectrum.

The democratic ideal is twisted with regard to consciousness as it is with
IQ. Yes, all humans are created equal as far as their human rights are
concerned but we all don’t have the same abilities or degrees of
capabilities or intelligence or consciousness. Somehow, such a recognition
is seen by some to be less than politically correct, or a denigration of
some individuals.

How primitive are we? If the notion of a CQ is touchy, try EQ, an
individual’s evolutionary quotient, and a relative scale measure of an
individual’s evolutionary development and potential. We continually make ad
hoc judgments, many times for the sake of our own security and safety, about
the relatively evolved or devolved physical, mental and consciousness
characteristics and signals of others just as we are doing continually about
their manifest IQ. A parent or teacher or psychologist expects a statement
like “This person has a higher IQ than that person” to be sophisticated and
socially acceptable. If, however, one dares broach the notion of a
consciousness quotient, CQ, communicatory flags go up; there is
disconcertion, confusion, and even conflict. Advance the concept of an EQ,
an evolutionary developmental quotient, and things get really squirrelly.
Once we are adjusted to the concept of the individual, from conception on,
recapitulating the stages of species evolution, we will begin to take the
notions of CQ and EQ as given. We will need them to recognize the
developmental stage of a child or adult in order to determine in which gene
pool context he or she should be educated in or contribute to at that point,
thereby most effectively promoting and accelerating her or his personal
realevolution.

The recognition that the stages of realevolution are stages of conscious
evolution will facilitate the resolution of the perennial academic problem
involving other than “normal” states of consciousness. At this primitive
stage, we cannot even agree on what constitutes the real or “legitimate”
elements of the spectrum of human consciousness. If an investigator’s
paradigm — or consciousness — does not happen to have the capacity for
some perception, sensitivity or ability, its reality is often denied, a
priori, in other humans. It may not even be admitted for testing or the
investigation turned into an inquisition using magicians as the inquisitors
instead of Dominican monks in the public square of some “learning” channel.
We argue about the reality of various kinds of extrasensory perception,
non-local communication, transcendental states, and perceivable
dimensionalities and never seem to be able to come to definitive conclusions
— unless, of course, the Pentagon needs remote viewers. Consciousness in,
consciousness out. Once we have understood realevolution as essentially a
process of consciousness development, the paranormal modalities will be
recognized as advanced, evolved functions along the realevolutionary
trajectory.

Timothy Leary, Ph.D., the Tesla of psychology, developed an elegant schema
to identify the types of consciousness at each stage of realevolution, past,
present and coming. I have included a summary of it as Appendix B. It is a
road and flight map of realevolution. Note well the simple but profound
advice: “The answer to all human problems is to recognize your genetic
stage, go to the place where your genetic peers hang out, and in that secure
place prepare yourself for the future stages inevitably awaiting you.”

We need institutions and governments that are built intrinsically on and for
those characteristics, to support and further the evolution of the species
and the individual as a primary function. The structure of constitutions and
laws should promote the greatest degree of freedom of expansion and
exploration by the individual and the species.

Well, you say, here in the U. S., the Constitution is an advanced and
enlightened document, which has solved many of those problems, at least in
this country. I submit that the Constitution, certainly advanced and
relatively enlightened when it was conceived and put in place, was an
ingenious solution, created by deists, for maintaining some semblance of
peace between the Colonial religious factions, restraining the religious
mayhem always under the surface. However, there is no indication of any
anticipation that there would ever be a resolution of those differences, no
anticipation of a common definition and understanding of human nature. The
Constitution, as unique and effective as it is as a set of rules of order in
a primitive situation, has become a locked-in legacy. It barely continues to
balance the powers, long term, and prevent the takeover of the government
and imposition of theocracy or fascism.

The extraordinary element remaining is the seed of evolutionary suggestion
clearly intended by its authors as expressed by Jefferson when he said:
“I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and constitutions. But
laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human
mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries
are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change. With the
change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with
the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which
fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen
of their barbarous ancestors.”

A planetarily consensual conception of the generically human will enable us
to derive improved forms of constitutions and develop systems of
representation of individual input and voting far more adequate and accurate
than our current systems of representation by strangers. That would be a
first step. They will render outmoded our current systems that are modeled,
to one degree or another on the residue of slave-code religious rules. They
will be determined democratically by direct input from the entire population
and constructed to further and abet the realevolution of the individual and
the species. We, in the U.S., are in need of a second Constitution. To that
purpose I have included a proposal in Appendix C. The essence of the
proposal is that we now have a tool, through the relatively awesome power of
the electronic medium, in the “open source” approach to programming and
system development that will afford us a means to moving beyond outmoded
representative government by the mediocracy to far more intelligent forms by
direct input by each citizen.

It is evident that the current serious crisis of world peace is largely due
to the “my god is better than your god” conflicts, the sad playing out of
the same kind of wars in which we were used as pawns by the Anunnaki. The
second major factor is economic: competition for limited resources which is
further exacerbated by the corruption of the powerful oppressing the weak.
How primitive are we? We need only examine every economic system attempted
or implemented through history to comprehend that all forms, to this point,
have been successful only to a point in limited circumstances. Every serious
economic and political structuring has proven to have benefits but equally
serious limitations and drawbacks due to conflicts over what and who a human
individual is and, therefore, what the rights of the individual are relative
to other humans and the state; what is considered moral, just; whether there
should be winners and losers; who should be taken care of and why; and, to
put it in modern academic jargon, who is the “other”. Certainly, the
potential for human degeneracy is always extant and partly at cause, but the
more fundamental Babel-factoring of our species still hinders us from taking
conscious part in our realevolution which is on schedule regardless. The new
paradigm will, eventually, see our political and economic systems as
mirroring our rapid though confused realevolutionary stages and consciously
and intelligently and compassionately developing evolving, dynamic systems
commensurate with our now and future trajectory. Artificial intelligence,
ironically, will probably have to be used to determine rapidly adjusting
economic systems for the benefit of all.

It’s All Over For The Current Consensual Worldview

Actually, it has been “all over” for some time now. Several works by various
authors may be noted as turning point markers just previous to the
introduction of Sitchin’s thesis.
Joseph Campbell’s master work, The Masks of God, surveyed and elucidated the
entire field of mythology. He accepted the basic premise that the “gods”
were mythological. However, he was compelled to question the basic working
premise of mythology that mythology had arisen through the naive
proto-”science” of early human minds attributing human characteristics on
the sun, moon, stars, and the phenomena of nature: storms, lightning, winds,
etc. He found very signicant the fact that the genealogies of the “gods”
were the same in India as they were in the Norse countries —- the names
were different because of the difference in languages but the genealogical
relationships were identical —- and had to conclude that something had
begun in the “little Sumerian mud garden” and spread to the rest of the
world. This was totally contradictory of the working premise of then and
current mythology but he let it go at noting its significance. This was a
demarcation for the introduction of Sitchin’s radical paradigm.

In 1976 Julian Jaynes of Princeton published his The Origin of Consciousness
In The Breakdown Of The Bicameral Mind, examining the evolution of human
consciousness in an erudite study that covered the classics, mythology,
archaeology, religion and history. He accepted the unquestioned premise that
the “gods” were mythological as did Campbell. He concludes that, because
previous to 1250 B.C. humans claimed to talk to the gods, get instructions
from them, hear them speak, worked for them, all men previous to that
turning point in time, must have been hallucinating schizophrenes because,
the gods being unreal, mythic, they must have been hearing them in their
heads (!!). In retrospect , Jaynes’ work can be seen as the last extreme
effort to make professional, academic sense out of the puzzling history
where the only two choices were the gods were imaginary, mythic or they were
real. it took Sitchin to provide the definitive validity of the “real”
choice.

Sitchin first published also in 1976 and has produced some nine volumes
since.

In 1996 Samuel P. Huntington published The Clash of Civilizations and the
Remaking Of World Order. Mr. Huntington presents a paradigm of global
politics in terms of the interactions between civilizations, a
“civilizational” approach, with the intention or providing insight into how
to avoid the clashes between civilizations which he sees as the greatest
threat to world peace and, conversely, how “an international order based on
civilizations is the surest safeguard against world war”.

The concept of a new world order, in itself, can be an idealistic and
benevolent goal although the perverted notion of such put forth by some
devolved politicians has set back an constructive progress in that direction
considerably. The League of Nations and, currently, the United Nations are
certainly steps in the right direction. The imposition of world domination
by economic, political, military, or theocratic coercion are retrograde and
primitive attempts doomed to well deserved failure. The conflicts and wars
covering the planet are, in their transparently theo-political base,
robot–like attempts to run the Realevolutionary videotape in reverse and
mark the beginning of a final, very slow denouement of that godspell
phenomenon.

To bring it down to the here and now: if America, or any country or culture
is going to be an example for the rest of the world, there is no other
choice but for it to set a Realevolutionary example and style. It will
require thinkers and scholars and innovators and futants from every
discipline in every culture and country and religion to assimilate the vast
amount of history, information, ooparts, traditions and technology which
have been rediscovered and recovered over the last one hundred and fifty
years from all parts of the world and to transform their religions and
cultures accordingly. How long will it take? The view from 2100 (A.D.) sees
it only begun in the 21st century and not totally completed by 2200.

Consciousness In, Consciousness Out

The new paradigm, elucidating our unique genesis and subsequent unique
evolution (at least on this planet: it may happen similarly with synthesized
species elsewhere) as, in a very real sense, an artificial intelligence,
frees us to conceive the real questions we need to ask ourselves and the
answers not only our science but the entire racial pool of experience and
knowledge needs to provide with regard to AI. One of the most important
contributions our restored history provides relates directly to the novel
wild card concept of self-aware artificial consciousness in that it
furnishes a wealth of information on the sociobiology of the creation of a
synthetic species and the resulting, evolving social relationship between
the creators and the created, between the Anunnaki and us.

Specifically, concerning the question as to whether Artificial Intelligence
can actually be achieved and how we should go about it, our history is a
strong source of a positive answer. The Anunnaki, even while here, according
to the recovered records of their deeds and interactions, besides
genetically inventing humans, quite clearly had developed robots and
androids, some of the latter being so sophisticated that, it is written, it
was difficult to tell one from a human or an Anunnaki. We can profit from
the Anunnaki’s experience in both creating a new species and in their
development and use of robots and sophisticated androids as well as the
awesome invention of a species such as we.

The realization of our half-alien genetic makeup and our relationship to the
Anunnaki stretches our perspective to afford an effective way for us to
begin to grasp the topic of alien presence on this planet. It also enables
a, previously unattainable, unassailable integrity individually and as a
race which will be essential to entering into direct contact with alien
species, either in the future or with ones that are already here on the
planet. We shall finally enter stellar society as a mature race which knows
who and what it is, what is good for it and what is not; with whom or what
it could interact, with whom and what it would be dangerous to make contact;
with the minimum of preconceptions as to how things should be. Until we know
who and what we are we will probably not be allowed into stellar society.
Until we break the godspell and stop looking up for Daddy to come back,
looking for some solution or salvation from outside, we will be in danger of
getting Borged by whomever shows up here. The topic of alien contact is
probably the most dramatic of examples of how narrow and primitive our focus
is. It is a fact and the gradual insinuation of it into our collective
consciousness has progressed in the last fifty years.

A Retrospective View From 2100

The elements that characterize the new civilization are a collective,
consensual awareness of our generic humanity as a planetary unity, a
recognition of a common, known history from the beginning of the race as a
genetically engineered species, a globally common conception of human nature
and its evolutionary direction, a multi–dimensional sociobiology capable of
reflexive self-analysis, a psychology devoted to fostering the positive
evolutionary development of the individual over the entire spectrum of
consciousness, a unified scientific field expressed through a profound
natural language based on self-referential consciousness, an ecological,
non-competitive, ubiquitously helpful economics, an integral systems
approach to the management of the material realm, with the primary focus on
the transcendental as the essential human process.

With the demise of godspell religions and the dawning of a generic,
planetary, definition of human nature the social context and educational
process will undergo a profound revolution. The orientation will not be to a
creationist or a Darwinian evolutionary context but to a generic,
planetarily common realevolutionary context. We will be finally free to
understand our common species predecessors and our bicameral species
heritage in perspective. That perspective will afford us the detailed
information concerning the stages of developmental realevolution we have
passed through to this point. We will be able to understand and utilize the
realevolutionary map of those stages as laid out by Leary in the
first-of-its-kind schema in Appendix B and even better ones to follow.

The awareness of the historical stages and trajectory of realevolution will
make us conscious of the agenda of DNA, of our genetic coding: survival and
ever increasing conscious control over our own existence. We might say that
we are totally determined to determine our own determination. Gene pools
(groups throughout the population that are predominantly programmed for
certain functions for survival of the species) will be recognized for what
they are and valued. Once conscious of the nature and purpose of these
specialized populations and how they map on to the stages of realevolution
we will see that we may move from gene pool to gene pool, adsorbing the
ancient wisdom of each for survival and personal learning and expansion.
Moving from gene pool to gene pool will be a natural process of an
individual’s unique personal realevolutionary process. There will be a
mutual respect and positive recognition between gene pools beyond just
tolerance, and the only rule necessary will be a consensually agreed
prohibition of any gene pool doing anything that will harm or obstruct the
function of another gene pool. The gene pool golden rule. It also brings us
full circle around to the children, us in the future. I project a
realevolutionary scenario for the treatment and education of the children of
the 21st century to develop as follows.

A further refinement of the gene pool concept will be its incorporation into
the educational process: the stages of the recapitulatory developmental
process of the human child will be mapped onto the various gene pools but
without assigning hierarchical ranking to them. A child will have the
opportunity to experience the best features of the various phases of human
evolutionary experimentation. The quintessence of the hunter, the gatherer,
the agriculturist cultures presented by those steeped and expert in the
context will put the student in tune with deep genetic roots, survival
methods, cooperation and creativity. The crafts, industrial, mechanical,
engineering, construction, building gene pools; the arts, literary, musical
pools; the military, police, and civil servant gene pools all have some
essence of their orientation to reality to offer as insight into a facet of
human nature and ingenuity. The domestic, child-bearing and rearing,
cooperative, social, political, educational, pools will certainly all
contribute to the recapitulatory phases of a child’s development, each at
its proper time.
The children will be encouraged to be their own philosophers from the
earliest age according to their capacity at any age and stage. They will be
encouraged to make their own decisions about reality and to explore and
follow their own unique evolutionary development and to respectfully make
their unique contribution to the ongoing conversation about the ideal
trajectory of our collective species’ evolution. Language, reason, logic
will be understood to be a product of certain stages of our realevolutionary
perception of three dimensional reality. They will be taught the nature of
reality in the most expanded scientific and philosophical context we know,
and introduced to the concept of action which enhances others while it
enhances us. They will be enabled to continue the process of personal
realevolution on their own. In peace.

What to do after genetic enlightenment has broken the godspell, the
looking-to-the-sky-for-daddy-to-return, master-slave attitude, the, deepest
dye in the fabrics of all cultures? In the immediate future, the god games
we shall play as our own evolutionary artists are immortality ; self
directed, conscious evolution; four-dimensional consciousness; life under a
law of everything; practical transcendence; the development of AI as a
subordinate species and for use in surrogate operations. For starters.
Physical immortality, possessed by the Nefilim, withheld from humans, will
be transformed, from “religious” afterlife reward to the dominant
characteristic of the dawning phase of our racial maturation. We will be our
own “gods”, our own genetic credentials, play our own god games with an
unassailable species identity enabling us to step confidently into stellar
society.

But what of us individually? Once the ancient, subservient godspell is
dispelled we are freed, individually, to go one on one with the universe. We
will operate as our own “gods”, according to our own genetic credentials,
play our own god games according to our own transcendental choices, creating
our own confident realities. We will perfect systematic self-supersedure as
a means of conscious evolution to an art form.

The characteristics that mark the new human are an unassailable personal
integrity, relativistic epistemology, profound compassion, robust depth of
informational data, understanding of the universe in terms of a full unified
field, broad-spectrum competence, transcendental competition, facility in
dimensional shifting, preference for dyadic operation, a profound ability to
enjoy, to play the games most enjoyable and satisfying to generic “gods”, an
expanded capacity to literally have great fun creating new realities, with
the primary focus on the multi-dimensional. And to play those “god” games in
the context of relative immortality and, eventually, habitual
four-dimensional consciousness.

We have at hand the cumulative data and information to initiate the
planetary unification process. Let us make it so for the children.

This paper is copyrighted by Neil Freer, but it may be freely downloaded, by
the author’s permission granted here, translated, printed, copied, quoted,
distributed in any appropriate media providing only that it not be altered
in any way in text or intent and the author is properly credited.

Appendix A
1.
A Synopsis of the Sitchin Paradigm

Working from the same archaeological discoveries, artifacts, and recovered
records as archaeologists and linguists have for two hundred years, Sitchin
propounds – proves, in the opinion of this author –that the Anunnaki
(Sumerian: “those who came down from the heavens”; Old testament Hebrew,
Anakeim, Nefilim, Elohim; Egyptian: Neter), an advanced civilization from
the tenth planet in our solar system, splashed down in the Persian gulf area
around 432,000 years ago, colonized the planet, with the purpose of
obtaining large quantities of gold. Some 250,000 years ago, the recovered
documents tell us, their lower echelon miners rebelled against the
conditions in the mines and the Anunnaki directorate decided to create a
creature to take their place. Enki, their chief scientist and Ninhursag
their chief medical officer, after getting no satisfactory results splicing
animal and Homo Erectus genes, merged their Anunnaki genes with that of Homo
Erectus and produced us, Homo Sapiens, a genetically bicameral species, for
their purposes as slaves. Because we were a hybrid, we could not procreate.
The demand for us as workers became greater and we were genetically
manipulated to reproduce.

Eventually, we became so numerous that some of us were expelled from the
Anunnaki city centers, gradually spreading over the planet. Having become a
stable genetic stock and developing more precociously than, perhaps, the
Anunnaki had anticipated, the Anunnaki began to be attracted to humans as
sexual partners and children were born of these unions. This was
unacceptable to the majority of the Anunnaki high council and it was decided
to wipe out the human population through a flood that was predictable when
Nibiru, the tenth in our solar system and the Anunnaki home planet, came
through the inner solar system again (around 12,500 years ago) on one of its
periodic 3600 year returns. Some humans were saved by the action of the
Anunnaki official, Enki, who was sympathetic to the humans he had originally
genetically created. For thousands of years, we were their slaves, their
workers, their servants, and their soldiers in their political battles among
themselves. The Anunnaki used us in the construction of their palaces (we
retroproject the religious notion of temple on these now), their cities,
their mining and refining complexes and their astronomical installations on
all the continents. They expanded from Mesopotamia to Egypt to India to
South and Central America and the stamp of their presence can be found in
the farthest reaches of the planet.

Around 6000 years ago, they, probably realizing that they were going to
phase off the planet, began, gradually, to bring humans to independence.
Sumer, a human civilization, amazing in its “sudden”, mature, and highly
advanced character was set up under their tutelage in Mesopotamia. Human
kings were inaugurated as go-betweens, foremen of the human populations
answering to the Anunnaki. A strain of humans, genetically enhanced with
more Anunnaki genes, a bloodline of rulers in a tradition of “servants of
the people” was initiated (Gardner). These designated humans were taught
technology, mathematics, astronomy, advanced crafts and the ways of advanced
civilized society (in schools, called now “mystery schools” but there was no
mystery about them). Gardner has brought to light the fact that there exists
a robust, highly documented, genealogical, genetic history carrying all the
way back to the Anunnaki, possessed by the heterodox tradition of
Christianity, which is only now coming forward, no longer gun shy of the
Inquisition. This tradition, preserving the bloodline, is the one branded
“heretical” and murderously persecuted by the Roman Church. There were no
Dark Ages for this tradition, only for those whom the Church wanted to keep
in the dark about the real nature of human history and destroy the
bloodline, a direct threat to the power of the Bishops.

What evidence supports the Sitchin thesis?

The Astronomical Evidence

“…no concrete problem is going to be solved as long as the experts of
astronomy are too supercilious to touch “mythical” ideas — which are firmly
believed to be plain nonsense, of course — as long as historians of
religion swear to it that stars and planets were smuggled into originally
“healthy” fertility cults and naive fairy tales only “very late” — whence
these unhealthy subjects should be neglected by principle — and as long as
the philologists imagine that familiarity with grammar replaces that
scientific knowledge which they lack, and dislike.”

Giorgio de Santillana, Ph.D.
& Hertha von Dechend, Ph.D.
Hamlet’s Mill

A key underpinning of the Sitchin paradigm is the existence, now or in the
past, of the tenth planet in our solar system, the home planet of the
Anunnaki with the size, orbit, and characteristics described, as Sitchin has
demonstrated, in the Enuma Elish and corroborated by Harrington, former
chief of the U.S. Naval Observatory, now deceased.

Tombaugh discovered Pluto in 1930. Christie, of the U.S. Naval Observatory,
discovered Charon, Pluto’s moon, in 1978. The characteristics of Pluto
derivable from the nature of Charon demonstrated that there must still be a
large planet undiscovered because Pluto could not be the cause of the
residuals, the “wobbles” in the orbital paths of Uranus and Neptune clearly
identifiable. The IRAS (Infrared Astronomical Satellite), during ’83 -’84,
produced observations of a tenth planet so robust that one of the
astronomers on the project said that “all that remains is to name it” –
from which point the information has become curiously guarded. In 1992
Harrington and Van Flandern of the Naval Observatory, working with all the
information they had at hand, published their findings and opinion that
there is, indeed, a tenth planet, even calling it an “intruder” planet. The
search was narrowed to the southern skies, below the ecliptic. Harrington
invited Sitchin, having read his book and translations of the Enuma Elish,
to a meeting at his office and they correlated the current findings with the
ancient records.

The recovered the Enuma Elish, the major transcultural document from Sumer
to forming the basis for Genesis, a history of the formation of our solar
system and more, says that, at the time when Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter,
Uranus and Saturn were in place, there was a Uranus sized planet, called
Tiamat, in orbit between Mars and Jupiter. Earth was not in place yet. A
large wandering planet, called Nibiru, was captured into the system
gravitationally. As it passed by the outer planets it caused the anomalies
of their moons, the tilting of Uranus on its side, the dislodging of Pluto
from its being a moon of Saturn to its own planetary orbit. Its path bent by
the gravitational pull of the large planets, first its satellites collided
with the large planet Tiamat and, on a second orbit through, Nibiru collided
with Tiamat, driving the larger part of it into what is now Earth’s orbit to
recongeal as Earth, dragging its moon with it to become our Moon with all
its anomalies. The shattered debris of Tiamat’s smaller part became the
asteroid belt, comets, and meteorites. The gouge of our Pacific basin is
awesome testimony to the collisional event. Nibiru settled into a 3600 year
elliptical retrograde (opposite direction to all the other planets) orbit
around our sun, coming in through the asteroid belt region between Mars and
Jupiter at perigee and swinging far out past Pluto at apogee. Harrington
acknowledged that his information agreed with all these details and the maps
they each had drawn of the orbits were almost indistinguishable. The current
probable location of Nibiru (Planet X, our tenth) estimated by both was the
same.

For meeting between Harrington and Sitchin at the Naval Observatory, click
here video interview use your BACK button to return to this place.

It is the opinion of this author and others that, in light of the evidence
already obtained through the use of the Pioneer 10 and 11 and two Voyager
space craft, the Infrared Imaging Satellite (IRAS, `83-84) and the clear and
unequivocal statements of Harrington when consulting with Sitchin, that the
search has already been accomplished, in fact that the planet has already
been found — and has been tracked, studied, it’s orbit determined and it’s
time of return to the inner solar system calculated. Astronomers are
strangely silent and reticent to talk about such a monumental item.

We need to force the issue of the tenth planet being in our solar system,
not just to demonstrate the validity of the new paradigm but for a very
practical reason. The ancient records are very clear. The passage of the
tenth planet, Nibiru, once every 3600 years, through the inner solar system
effects the Earth, sometimes in catastrophic ways. It is very probably the
cause of pole shifts, pole reversals, changes in the precessional movement,
perhaps even catastrophic bombardment by asteroid size space debris that it
may drag along with it. Since it passes through the asteroid belt area
between Mars and Jupiter and its orbital path may vary depending on the
position of the other planets when it comes though, it may have been
responsible for the devastation of Mars. A rigorous, detailed computer
modeling of the solar system, including the tenth planet needs to be done
urgently for our own planetary safety. Remember that the Vatican maintains
an astronomical observatory and Msgr. Balducci may have access to
information that prompts him to make the amazing statements he has —- no
doubt as voice of the Vatican.

The Technological Evidence

Ooparts is the term used to describe the purportedly out of place in time
artifacts, toys, tools, technical devices, depictions and documents which
have come to light through archaeological excavation or discovery. Almost
everyone is familiar, through published works or documentaries, with the
clay pot batteries still containing the electrodes from the Iraqi desert
dated at 2500 B.C., the flyable model airplane from a pyramid tomb, the
sophisticated machining of stone requiring the most advanced techniques we
know today, the 1000 ton precision cut blocks of stone in a temple
foundation that we could not even handle, an ancient relief frieze from an
Abydos temple depicting rockets, airplanes and even a helicopter, etc. The
most recent and quite amazing oopart is the rediscovery of monoatomic gold
by David Hudson (Monoatomics are superconductors at room temperature, have
anti-gravitic properties and are only now being investigated by the advanced
physics community) Hudson’s discovery, correlated with the bringing to
light, by Gardner, of the suppressed discovery of the Anunnaki gold
processing plant on Mt. Horeb by Sir Flinders Petrie in 1889 demonstrates
that the monoatomics were already known at least 3000 years ago. These
ooparts coupled with evidence from many disciplines and the historical
records indicate that an advanced civilization existed in those times
possessing a high technology and that that civilization was indeed the
Anunnaki.

The Documentary Evidence

The recorded historical documentation for the existence and deeds of the
Anunnaki has become gradually available to us only since the early 1800′s.
The excavation of the ancient sites of Mesopotamia brought to light the
amazingly advanced civilization of Sumer and, with it, thousands of clay
tablets containing not only mundane records of commerce, marriages, military
actions and advanced astronomical calculation systems but of the history of
the Anunnaki themselves. It is clear from those records that the Sumerians
knew these aliens to be real flesh and blood. The library of the ruler,
Ashurbanipal, at Nineveh was discovered to have burnt down and the clay
tablets held there were fired, preserving them for our reading. One of the
most impressive finds, in very recent time, has been a sealed, nine foot by
six foot room in Sippar holding, neatly arranged on shelves, a set of some
400 elaborate clay tablets containing an unbroken record of the history of
those ancient times, a sort of time capsule. The evidence is so overwhelming
and robust that, if it weren’t for those with power enough to suppress, it
would have been accepted and our world view changed a century ago or,
perhaps, sooner.

The Genetic Evidence

The recovered records place the location of the Anunnaki laboratory where
the first humans were literally produced in east central Africa just above
their gold mines. This falls precisely on the map where the mitochondrial
DNA “search for Eve” places the first woman Homo Sapiens and in the same
period. (The gold mining engineers of Africa have found 100,000-year-old
gold mines in that area.) The evidence for, and description of advanced
genetic engineering is all there in the ancient documents. Our rapid
progress from inception to going to Mars soon, after only 250,000 years,
does not correspond to the million year periodicities of slow evolutionary
development of other species such as Homo Erectus before us. As so many
thinkers have pointed out, we are radically and anomalously different, as
discussed in part three.

Scientific Objections to the Thesis

How could the Anunnaki, clearly described as comfortable in earth gravity
and atmosphere, very similar to current humans in all ways, have evolved on
a planet within our solar system whose orbital apogee takes it into the deep
cold of space for much of its orbit?

The ancient records repeatedly describe Nibiru as a “radiant” planet. This
may be understood as having a high core temperature. Although controversial,
there is also astrophysical opinion that a large body in elongated orbit is
constantly tending toward circular orbit and this causes stresses in the
body that could generate a good deal of heat. That their planet is gradually
cooling, may be indicated by Sitchin’s interpretation of their colonizing
Earth (contains most of the gold identifiable in the solar system) for the
purpose of obtaining large quantities of gold for molecular seeding of their
atmosphere with a reflective gold shielding. Pertinent here is Harrington’s
confident statement to Sitchin that it is “a nice, good planet, could be
surrounded by gases, probably has an atmosphere and could support life like
ours”. The sunlight level there might be quite different than on earth. The
Anunnaki were often depicted or sculpted with what seem to be obviously
sunglasses.

If, however, the Anunnaki evolved on a radically different planet from earth
under quite different conditions to which to adapt, why should they have
turned out to be so identical to human species? Sitchin’s answer is based on
the collisional event between the intruder planet, Nibiru, and the planet
Tiamat, the residual part of which recongealed into the Earth after being
driven into current Earth orbit. That the two, or at least one, of the
colliding planets was sufficiently developed to have evolved basic organic
compounds, perhaps even simple life, the cross-seeding of everything from
amino acids to more complicated organic compounds or even primitive
organisms, could account for the evolutionary similarity. Although this
author finds it a reasonable hypothesis, even trivial, that advanced
civilizations would be capable of crossing extremely different genomes,
perhaps with even radically different bases, the cross-seeding theory can
account for the apparent relative ease with which the Anunnaki impinged
their genes on the genes of Homo Erectus. The Anunnaki skill level, 200,000
years ago, is indicated well by the recorded fact that, in early trials,
they succeeded in crossing animal genes with Homo Erectus genes, obtained
living hybrids but never a satisfactory product which led them to modify
Homo Erectus genes with their advanced genes.

If our genome is estimated as 98% to 99% similar to the chimpanzee, how
could there be a melding of the Homo Erectus and Anunnaki genomes, or
impingement of the advanced code on the lesser advanced one detectable? The
author suggests that this is a major question probably answerable only by
the geneticists eopen mindednough to attack it. The resolution of that
question should provide rich additional clues in itself.

Click here to visit Sitchin’s website (sitchin.com). Use the “back” button
to return to this page. Recommended books by Sitchin.

Click here to visit Jason Martell’s excellent site for pictures of Sumerian
artifacts, museum pieces, information and video clips. Use your “back”
button to return to this page.

OVERVIEW

1. The logo says it all. The image on the left is of a clay tablet,
recovered from the Middle East, depicting the celebration of the successful
genetic engineering creation of our species by the alien ( the transcultural
“gods” known to all the ancient civilizations) Anunnaki scientists, Enki and
Ninhursag, 200,000 years ago. (Yes, you read it correctly: keep an open
mind, you’ll need it on this site.)

The image on the right is the one placed on the Pioneer 10 space craft to
inform alien species among the stars of our existence. We, Sapiens, have
been rising, are rising, evolving in a unique, post Darwinian modality,
rapidly, precociously, from square one as a slave species a brief 200,000
years ago to going to the stars, shortly, as our own “gods”, our own
half-alien evolutionary artists. We will talk here about stepping out of
racial adolescence, restoring our real history and what the ramifications
are for the present and the future beyond the slave-code religions, the
sublimation of our ancient master-slave relationship to the Anunnaki. The
totems and taboos of our racial adolescence dispelled, Prometheus can get
off his rock and reach genetic satori; Job can get off his dung heap and
complete his EST training; Buddha can open his eyes and reach genetic
enlightenment; Jesus the man can disavow sectarian politics and run again
for genetic office.

If I am right, if, you will find here a literal rethinking of this planet; a
comprehensive, robust and startling new worldview of who and what we are;
the ramifications of the restoration of our true history as a genetically
engineered species; a resolution of the creationist-evolutionist conflict; a
clear view of the forward trajectory of our species’ real evolution. In
short, the focus of this site is on a new view of planetary reality at a
fundamental level far more profound than the usual political, religious,
historical, intellectual concepts in which we think —– and conflict.

You will find here a vision of the generic human beyond religion, Darwin’s
quaint view of evolution, the recycled explanations and failed solutions of
millennia past, and the old new age. You will find hope, positive direction,
progress, talk of immortality, the new human, and a view from 2100 A.D. of
where our species’ realevolution could, should, will take us within the next
100 years. You will find yourself, here, Sapiens, rising, perhaps a bit
dazed, now coming out of species adolescence, eager and ready for alien
society. The largest focus is Universe. The immediate focus is on the
children: we must not lose one more generation of our best to our primitive
follies.

The more I know, the more I know I don’t know. At any given time you access
this site, it will be the best I can conceive, the best I can offer, with
respect, and for your judgment. it is a work in progress and, intentionally,
will improve continually: please visit from time to time. The information
offered here is worthless unless utilized.

2.
This is written on the first day of Spring, 2004. The life force coming back
up from its winter pause in the Earth here in the high desert is tangible,
timeless, unconcerned and amused. The golden heat from our reliable local
solar furnace feels even better on my shoulders than when I was a kid
roaming the summer stream banks back East. When I look around, however, from
a futant perspective, the entire population of the planet looks as if it’s
in a mild agony, most intense in the bodies and minds of the young being
sacrificed by the elders in yet another criminal war, but effecting all to
some degree from pole to pole. For we are at yet another of those crises,
turning points in our short and puzzling species’ history, each one more
critically decisive because of the gravity of the immediate threats to our
survival with which we insist on confronting ourselves.

This site is the work of a “think tank” of one — a generalist, futurist and
futant, by genetic proclivity, in one skin. Concomitantly, however, I
acknowledge everyone, including the alien “community”, witting or unwitting,
as collaborators because, as a generic human, I want to know how everything
and everyone relate to every other thing and person. In a word, the focus is
Universe. That may seem a bit grandiose but, in this age of decadent and,
often, funding dependent specialization, someone had better damn well do it.

As a generalist, currently, I am focused on the resolution of the ancient
conflicts, contradictions, questions and paradoxes of our species’ puzzling
and clearly manipulated history —- in the context of Universe. The goal:
to bring our knowledge to the stage of change marked by the fifth line of
Hexagram 57, The Gentle, Penetration, of the venerable I Ching:
Remorse vanishes.
Nothing that does not further.
No beginning, but and end.
Good fortune. Which change morphs the situation into Hexagram 18, Work on
what has been spoiled: the futurist, on the lookout for the “wild cards”
that may ambush or afford accelerated advantage, integrates the potential
and cautionary signals of cutting edge developments in all disciplines and
arenas with the retrieved past to transform what has been spoiled into an
overarching, comprehensive, generically human, forward-creative paradigm.

What has been spoiled, wasted, all these millennia, are generation after
generation of our young, the lives of countless millions, through the
Babel-factored conflicts and hideous wars, more often than not due to
nothing more or less than the insane “my god is better than your god”
syndrome. True, as a genetically engineered slave species, we should go a
little easy on ourselves due to the, perhaps, uniqueness of our “unnatural”
situation, but that does not mitigate the immediacy of the danger of the
mess we have gotten ourselves into planet wide. And what is the mess all
about?

The perspective of the futant view from 2100 A.D. finds our denial of our
beginnings and history, our Babel-factored ignorance of what and who we are,
our continuance in cargo cult, godspell, slave-code “religions”, our
disconnect with nature, our resignation to death, our ridiculous reaction to
the obvious alien presence, our lack of comprehension of our real
evolutionary trajectory, embarrassingly primitive. This syndrome is the most
fundamental formative factor at base of the clash of civilizations, nations,
tribes, individuals.

It’s best to begin to give a futant report from an anchor point in the
present, logically, in this case, from within the center of the current
crisis. It is difficult, however, because there is no encapsulating the
essence of this crisis as political, or economic, or sociological, or
scientific, or military or philosophical or religious: it is inescapably
about everything. Its inexorable, ponderous churning, disturbing the bodies
and minds of everyone on planet and off, is about entire world views, solar
system views and views of the cosmos, human and alien. Personal realities,
the strong or tenuous views of self identity, of individuals, groups, of
cultures, religions, nations, and what it fundamentally is to be generically
human on this planet are constantly being probed and challenged, the
constant irritation leading to profound unease, disease and overt conflict.

What is the fundamental, core problem? The entire planet, all its cultures,
religions, politics and sociology including the definition of “human”
requires, indeed demands, radical rethinking including the institutions and
authorities to which we have always looked for truth and validation.

What has brought the planet to this point? By 2000 we in the West had
accumulated more than sufficient evidence and data to restore the true
history of our amazing beginnings and precocious development to ourselves
—– and found ourselves to have been far deeper in denial, indeed close to
species amnesia, with regard to those vital facts than we in the East. The
gradually accumulated, overwhelming archaeological and historical
information and data from the past, elucidated by the science of the
present, gives clear, overwhelming evidence of an entirely new,
comprehensive and overarching worldview that corrects, subsumes and replaces
the old. This new paradigm is attributed to the Nobel quality work of the
Sumerian scholar, Zecharia Sitchin.

The Key to Planetary Unity

The key fact that is the cause of the revolution in interpretation and
understanding is that the transcultural gods (the Anunnaki [Sumerian: those
who came down from the heavens; Hebrew: Anakeim, Nefilim; Egyptian: Neter,
the “Watchers”) known to all the ancient civilizations, as Sitchin has
conclusively demonstrated, were not mythological, but real flesh and blood
humanoids. They were, most probably still are, an alien civilization who
colonized this planet 432,000 years ago coming from their home planet, the
tenth, Planet X, Nibiru, in our own solar system. They came here for gold,
eventually created us by genetically crossing their genes with those of Homo
Erectus around 200,000 years ago as a slave race for their mining
operations. That profound reinterpretation of our beginnings and subsequent
development changes everything. Literally.
Corroboration comes from evidence for the existence in our solar system of
Planet X/Nibiru from the Naval Observatory, probably found by the IRAS
search in ’83-’94; the mitochondrial DNA “search for Eve”; the “out of
Africa” data placing our genesis in Central Africa 250,000 years.

The ramifications and consequences, which I explored and laid out in 1987 in
Breaking the Godspell are astounding, startling and powerful. The word from
station DNA is these “gods” wear designer genes.

We are a genetically engineered, mutant species with bicameral genetics,
bicameral mind, moving through a rapid, non-Darwian development, now coming
out of species adolescence into an independent maturity and identity. We
have progressed from being their slave animals to limited partnership and
are now phasing out of a 3000 year traumatic transition to racial
independence, a rapid metamorphic process, under the imperative of our
advanced Nefilim genetic component.

Religion, as we know it world wide, is the residual sublimation and
transmutation of the ancient master-slave relationship, the godspell,
expressed in the slave-code commandments still echoing down the ages in our
cargo-cult rituals of subservient worship (work-ship). It is manifest that
Jehovah/YHWH, Adonai, the Lord, and Allah, El, were all Anunnaki. The
concept of “God” as a stern male disciplinarian doling out horrendous
physical punishments, as well as the cosmified metaphysical edition is no
longer adequate and almost embarrassing. Those who still swear by the Bible,
in any of its myriad versions, as the revealed word of their “God” have to
ignore or deny the clear fact that the Old Testament was a skewed and forged
theo-political rewrite of a far more ancient document, the Enuma Elish,
dating from at least Sumeria, which was not theological at all.

Transcendental experience is redefined as dimensional expansion and
participation at the leading edge of our species and individual metamorphic
self exploration. The “occult” is time-release packages of advanced
technological information entrusted to us in “crash courses” in
civilization. Ooparts, high-tech tools, toys, artifacts, “out of place” in
time are remnants of lost technology and knowledge and clues to recovering
our true history. The new synthesis subsumes partial glimpses of a new
politic, new world order, enlightened eco-economics, re-hashed Eastern or
Western mysticism, a third culture, spiritualized psychology, or cerebral
turning points.

This is the only worldview which is comprehensive and robust enough to
explain and correct all our previous explanations of the basic question: Who
are we and where did we really come from? It is the only paradigm coherent
and comprehensive enough to provide a planetarily consensual context by
which to unify all humans and achieve world order and peace and free us, as
a species, to matriculate into stellar society. We now have the keys to
integrate our past in the concept of generic humanity, the critical factor
for planetary unity. We have had at hand for an embarrassingly long time,
more than enough evidence, information and capabilities to literally rethink
this Planet. We are long overdue, to the point of species endangerment, to
get on with it.
What to do after genetic enlightenment has broken the godspell, the
looking-to-the-sky-for-daddy to return, master-slave attitude the deepest
dye in the fabrics of all cultures? Physical immortality, possessed by the
Nefilim, withheld from humans, will be transformed from “religious”
afterlife reward to the dominant characteristic of the dawning phase of our
racial maturation. We will be our own “gods”, our own genetic credentials,
play our own god-games with an unassailable racial identity enabling us to
step confidently into stellar society. I explored these dimensions as a
practicing immortal in God Games: What Do You Do Forever?

It is the children who are the prime concern here. The view from 2100 says
clearly that Sapiens is indeed rising. These futant experiential
intelligence briefings, the product of best effort, are offered respectfully
and cautiously to the end that Sapiens, having retrieved the common
genealogy and history, caught the direction of the trajectory of freedom,
will grasp a sense of species identity and planetary unity. We work toward
the time when, having achieved friendly separation from the ancient parents,
come out of dazed species adolescence, Sapiens will finally break into
laughter at the absurdity of godspell separation and, looking around, see
that the children are, for the first time, with great relief, also sharing
the laughter. We all need to work on what has been spoiled for their sake
and ours. I invite you to join in the process. In order to intelligently
work on what has been spoiled in the past, it is best to understand those
effects in the present.

This crisis has been building for three thousand years. It has peaked now,
in hindsight inevitably and predictably, through the confluence of data and
information in every element of human thought and experience and psychology
at the deepest levels of our being, an inexorable upwelling of our
realevolution. The most psychotic and degenerate manifestation of this
crisis is the primitive and recurrent “my god is better than your god”
syndrome that has generated wars, crusades, jihads without end and is
clearly operational in the current international situation. In the context
of the new paradigm, this is clearly and simply the playing out of the
ancient Babel-factored situation.

What is retarding the situation is the godspell mentality, the
Babel-factoring of religions, the established patterns and cultures and
power structures, the tendency still to be subservient to authority, to look
to the outside for answers and “help”. The situation is further complexified
by the fact that the very criteria bases, religion, philosophy, science and
the new age vision, that we have looked to for verification of the new are
themselves up for reinterpretation and transformation. There is little doubt
in my mind that the recognition and acceptance of this new world view, as
obvious and robust as it is for so many already, may take a hundred years
although, for those who have broken the godspell, the crises, problems,
conflicts, questions, all have had answers and been solved potentially, and
some, actually, for a long time. In a word: it’s already all over.

From the most personal perspective, just about everything I’ve published on
this site, as advanced or “far out” depending on the reader’s orientation as
it may seem, is ancient, not to make a bad pun. What we usually call “news”,
about wars and rumors of wars, the fluctuations of the stock market,
political elections, scientific advances, etc. is, literally and
figuratively, against the backdrop of the new worldview, ancient history.
Until we restore our real history as generic humans and throw off the
Babel-factor influences that keep us separate and at odds, there will always
be the underlying potential for yet another theo-political conflict, war,
jihad, crusade, ethnic cleansing, tribal clash, oppression of minority,
religious persecution, economic or territorial aggression, broad scale
civilizational conflict. Conversely, new discoveries in ancient history, and
archaeological finds are significant news because they afford us vital
information to fill in the details of our restored, amazing past. New
scientific discoveries that enable us to understand the advanced science of
the Anunnaki are also critical: astronomy and genetics and physics have
contributed as much as archaeology.

Because of the immensity of the revolution in thought and behavior which is
clearly required, literally rethinking the planet, it at first almost
boggles the mind to envision in what way it can be and will be brought
about. I submit, however, that it is the gradual recognition of the alien
presence ( the UFO phenomenon in popular parlance) on and around the planet
which is the major factor already facilitating the implementation of the new
planetary paradigm. Just as archaeology has restored our real history,
astronomy has revealed how and from where an alien civilization could come
here and initiate that history, genetics has revealed the science by which
they initiated it, anthropology has facilitated our understanding of our
unique and precocious development, the alien presence compels humankind to
adjust to a stellar perspective and solar system travel becomes almost
trivial, our sophisticated roller skates on Mars rather boring. As Ronald
Reagan pointed out in five major addresses, including one at the U.N., any
perceived threat from the “outside” would bring all the nations of the world
together and our differences would all seem petty. As I have argued in the
white paper, The Alien Question, it is significant that both the alien
presence in general and our half-alien history are equally suppressed
because both threaten the position and power of the political and religious
elites. The revelation and acknowledgment of either diminishes the authority
and control of both. China, Belgium, Spain, Chile, Uruguay and and now
Mexico have officially acknowledged the alien presence; the United States
has not — publicly and officially. It is paradoxical that the nation which
considers itself the most “advanced”, modern nation in the world seemingly
has begun, after only 200 years, to lose its forward looking, pioneering
vision. When Cortez arrived in Mexico they mistook him for the “god” who
said he would return. It is rather obvious that they only made a mistake.
Mexico may become the teacher of the world when the Anunnaki, most likely
Enki, returns as promised and recorded in the Codexes when we are grown up
enough to again make contact.

More on the Anunnaki: www.enkispeaks.com/wordpress